Back to Search Start Over

Neurophysiological and neuroradiological test for early poor outcome (Cerebral Performance Categories 3–5) prediction after cardiac arrest: Prospective multicentre prognostication data

Authors :
Scarpino, M.
Lolli, F.
Lanzo, G.
Carrai, R.
Spalletti, M.
Valzania, F.
Lombardi, M.
Audenino, D.
Celani, M. G.
Marrelli, A.
Contardi, S.
Peris, A.
Amantini, A.
Sandroni, C.
Grippo, A.
Sandroni C. (ORCID:0000-0002-8878-2611)
Scarpino, M.
Lolli, F.
Lanzo, G.
Carrai, R.
Spalletti, M.
Valzania, F.
Lombardi, M.
Audenino, D.
Celani, M. G.
Marrelli, A.
Contardi, S.
Peris, A.
Amantini, A.
Sandroni, C.
Grippo, A.
Sandroni C. (ORCID:0000-0002-8878-2611)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

The data presented here are related to our research article entitled “Neurophysiology and neuroimaging accurately predict poor neurological outcome within 24 hours after cardiac arrest: a prospective multicentre prognostication study (ProNeCA)” [1]. We report a secondary analysis on the ability of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), brain computed tomography (CT) and electroencephalography (EEG) to predict poor neurological outcome at 6 months in 346 patients who were comatose after cardiac arrest. Differently from the related research article, here we included cerebral performance category (CPC) 3 among poor outcomes, so that the outcomes are dichotomised as CPC 1–2 (absent to mild neurological disability: good outcome) vs. CPC 3–5 (severe neurological disability, persistent vegetative state, or death: poor outcome). The accuracy of the index tests was recalculated accordingly. A bilaterally absent/absent-pathological amplitude (AA/AP) N20 SEPs wave, a Grey Matter/White Matter (GM/WM) ratio <1.21 on brain CT and an isoelectric or burst suppression EEG predicted poor outcome with 49.6%, 42.2% and 29.8% sensitivity, respectively, and 100% specificity. The distribution of positive results of the three predictors did not overlap completely in the population of patients with poor outcome, so that when combining them the overall sensitivity raised to 61.2%.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1196083395
Document Type :
Electronic Resource