Addressing tumor heterogeneity in esophageal adenocarcinoma through different molecular approaches

Several studies have shown epidemiologic, clinical, immune-histochemical and molecular differences among esophageal adenocarcinomas (EAC). Since pathogenesis and biology of this tumor are far to be well defined, our study aimed to examine intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity and to solve crucial controversies through different molecular approaches. Target sequencing was performed for sorted cancer subpopulations from formalin embedded material obtained from 38 EACs, not treated with neoadjuvant therapy. 35 out 38 cases carried at least one somatic mutation, not present in the corresponding sorted stromal cells. 73.7% of cases carried mutations in TP53 and 10.5% in CDKN2A. Mutations in other genes occurred at lower frequency, including HNF1A, not previously associated with EAC. Sorting allowed us to isolate clones with different mutational loads and/or additional copy number amplifications, confirming the high intra-tumor heterogeneity of these cancers. In our cohort TP53 gene abnormalities correlated with a better survival (P = 0.028); conversely, loss of SMAD4 protein expression was associated with a higher recurrence rate (P = 0.015). Shifting the focus on the epigenetic characterization of EAC, miR-221 and miR-483-3p resulted upregulated from the MicroRNA Array card analysis and confirmed with further testing. The up-regulation of both miRNAs correlated with clinical outcomes, in particular with a reduced cancer-specific survival (miR483-3p P=0.0293; miR221 P=0.0059). In vitro analyses demonstrated an increase for miR-483-3p (fold-change=2.7) that appear to be inversely correlated with SMAD4 expression in FLO-1 cell-line. In conclusion, selective sorting allowed to define the real mutation status and to isolate different cancer subclones. MiRNA expression analysis revealed a significant up-regulation of miR-221 and miR-483-3p, which correlated with worst prognosis, implying that they can be considered oncogenic factors in EAC. Therefore, cell sorting technologies