Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness, usability, and cost-benefit of a virtual reality-based telerehabilitation program for balance recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial

Authors :
Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Interuniversitario de Investigación en Bioingeniería y Tecnología Orientada al Ser Humano - Institut Interuniversitari d'Investigació en Bioenginyeria i Tecnologia Orientada a l'Ésser Humà
Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Gráfica - Departament d'Enginyeria Gràfica
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Generalitat Valenciana
Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red-Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición
Llorens Rodríguez, Roberto
Noe, Enrique
Colomer, Carolina
Alcañiz Raya, Mariano Luis
Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Interuniversitario de Investigación en Bioingeniería y Tecnología Orientada al Ser Humano - Institut Interuniversitari d'Investigació en Bioenginyeria i Tecnologia Orientada a l'Ésser Humà
Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Gráfica - Departament d'Enginyeria Gràfica
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Generalitat Valenciana
Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red-Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición
Llorens Rodríguez, Roberto
Noe, Enrique
Colomer, Carolina
Alcañiz Raya, Mariano Luis
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

[EN] Objectives: First, to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a virtual reality (VR) based telerehabilitation program in the balance recovery of individuals with hemiparesis after stroke in comparison with an in-clinic program; second, to compare the subjective experiences; and third, to contrast the costs of both programs. Design: Single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Neurorehabilitation unit. Participants: Chronic outpatients with stroke (N=30) with residual hemiparesis. Interventions: Twenty 45-minute training sessions with the telerehabilitation system, conducted 3 times a week, in the clinic or in the home. Main Outcome Measures: First, Berg Balance Scale for balance assessment. The Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment balance and gait sub-scales, and the Brunel Balance Assessment were secondary outcome measures. Clinical assessments were conducted at baseline, 8 weeks (posttreatment), and 12 weeks (follow-up). Second, the System Usability Scale and the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory for subjective experiences. Third, cost (in dollars). Results: Significant improvement in both groups (in-clinic group [control] and a home-based telerehabilitation group) from the initial to the final assessment in the Berg Balance Scale (eta(2)(p) = .68; P=.001), in the balance (eta(2)(p) = .24; P=.006) and gait (eta(2)(p) =.57, P=.001) subscales of the Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment, and in the Brunel Balance Assessment (control: chi(2)=15.0; P=.002; experimental: chi(2)=21.9; P=.001). No significant differences were found between the groups in any balance scale or in the feedback questionnaires. With regard to subjective experiences, both groups considered the VR system similarly usable and motivating. The in-clinic intervention resulted in more expenses than did the telerehabilitation intervention ($654.72 per person). Conclusions: First, VR-based telerehabilitation interventions can promote the reacquisition of locomotor skills associa

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
TEXT, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1138432102
Document Type :
Electronic Resource