Back to Search Start Over

Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke

Authors :
French, Beverley
Thomas, Lois Helene
Leathley, Michael John
Sutton, Chris J
Mcadam, Joanna
Forster, Anne
Langhorne, Peter
Price, Christopher
Walker, Andrew
Watkins, Caroline Leigh
French, Beverley
Thomas, Lois Helene
Leathley, Michael John
Sutton, Chris J
Mcadam, Joanna
Forster, Anne
Langhorne, Peter
Price, Christopher
Walker, Andrew
Watkins, Caroline Leigh
Publication Year :
2007

Abstract

Background: The active practice of task-specific motor activities is a component of current approaches to stroke rehabilitation. Objectives: To determine if repetitive task training after stroke improves global, upper or lower limb function, and if treatment effects are dependent on the amount, type or timing of practice. Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Trials Register (October 2006), The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, SportDiscus, Science Citation Index, Index to Theses, ZETOC, PEDro, and OT Seeker (to September 2006), and OT search (to March 2006). We also searched for unpublished/non-English language trials, conference proceedings, combed reference lists, requested information on bulletin boards, and contacted trial authors. Selection criteria: Randomised/quasi-randomised trials in adults after stroke, where the intervention was an active motor sequence performed repetitively within a single training session, aimed towards a clear functional goal, and where the amount of practice could be quantified. Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently screened abstracts, extracted data and appraised trials. Assessment of methodological quality was undertaken for allocation concealment, blinding, loss to follow up and equivalence of treatment. We contacted trial authors for additional information. Main results: Fourteen trials with 17 intervention-control pairs and 659 participants were included. Primary outcomes: results were statistically significant for walking distance (mean difference (MD) 54.6, 95% CI 17.5 to 91.7); walking speed (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.29, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.53); sit-to-stand (standard effect estimate 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.56); and of borderline statistical significance for functional ambulation (SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.51), and global motor function (SMD 0.32, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.66). There were no statistically significant differences for hand/arm function, or sitting balance/reach. Sec

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1137479422
Document Type :
Electronic Resource