Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of calibrated dilute thrombin time and aPTT tests with LC-MS/MS for the therapeutic monitoring of patients treated with dabigatran etexilate.

Authors :
UCL - (MGD) Laboratoire de biologie clinique
UCL - SSS/IREC/MONT - Pôle Mont Godinne
Douxfils, J
Dogné, J-M
Mullier, François
Chatelain, Bernard
Rönquist-Nii, Y
Malmström, R E
Hjemdahl, P
UCL - (MGD) Laboratoire de biologie clinique
UCL - SSS/IREC/MONT - Pôle Mont Godinne
Douxfils, J
Dogné, J-M
Mullier, François
Chatelain, Bernard
Rönquist-Nii, Y
Malmström, R E
Hjemdahl, P
Source :
Thrombosis and Haemostasis : international journal for vascular biology and medicine, Vol. 110, no.3 (2013)
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Ways to monitor dabigatran etexilate (DE) therapy would be useful in certain situations. Functional assays such as aPTT or Hemoclot® Thrombin Inhibitor (HTI) have been proposed to evaluate dabigatran concentrations, but previous findings are based on in vitro studies and results must be confirmed in clinical samples. It was the aim of this study to compare aPTT and HTI measurements with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) measurements of dabigatran in plasma samples from DE treated patients. Seventy-one plasma samples were included. aPTT was performed using STA-CKPrest® and SynthASil®. HTI was performed according to instructions from the manufacturer. The LC-MS/MS method utilised dabigatran-d3 as internal standard. The plasma concentration range was 0 to 645 ng/ml as measured by LC-MS/MS. Overall, the HTI and LC-MS/MS analyses correlated well (r²=0.97). The Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 9 ng/ml (SD: 20 ng/ml). However, the HTI performed poorly at concentrations <50 ng/ml. LC-MS/MS was sensitive (limit of quantification 1.1 ng/ml) and specific for dabigatran. The aPTT methods did not correlate well with plasma concentrations measured by LC-MS/MS (r² = 0.59 with SynthASil® and 0.50 with STA-CKPrest®). In conclusion, the poor sensitivity, important inter-individual variability, and poor correlation with LC-MS/MS preclude the use of aPTT to estimate dabigatran concentrations. Due to its small inter-individual variability and good agreement with LC-MS/MS measurements, we recommend the use of HTI assays to rather accurately estimate concentrations of dabigatran >50 ng/ml. Quantification of lower dabigatran levels in DE-treated patients requires the "reference" LC-MS/MS method.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Thrombosis and Haemostasis : international journal for vascular biology and medicine, Vol. 110, no.3 (2013)
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1130499505
Document Type :
Electronic Resource