Back to Search Start Over

Intensified chemotherapy with ACVBP plus rituximab versus standard CHOP plus rituximab for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LNH03-2B): an open-label randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors :
UCL - (MGD) Service d'hématologie
Récher, Christian
Coiffier, Bertrand
Haioun, Corinne
Molina, Thierry Jo
Fermé, Christophe
Casasnovas, Olivier
Thiéblemont, Catherine
Bosly, André
Laurent, Guy
Morschhauser, Franck
Ghesquières, Hervé
Jardin, Fabrice
Bologna, Serge
Fruchart, Christophe
Corront, Bernadette
Gabarre, Jean
Bonnet, Christophe
Janvier, Maud
Canioni, Danielle
Jais, Jean-Philippe
Salles, Gilles
Tilly, Hervé
André, Marc
UCL - (MGD) Service d'hématologie
Récher, Christian
Coiffier, Bertrand
Haioun, Corinne
Molina, Thierry Jo
Fermé, Christophe
Casasnovas, Olivier
Thiéblemont, Catherine
Bosly, André
Laurent, Guy
Morschhauser, Franck
Ghesquières, Hervé
Jardin, Fabrice
Bologna, Serge
Fruchart, Christophe
Corront, Bernadette
Gabarre, Jean
Bonnet, Christophe
Janvier, Maud
Canioni, Danielle
Jais, Jean-Philippe
Salles, Gilles
Tilly, Hervé
André, Marc
Source :
The Lancet, Vol. 378, no.9806, p. 1858-67 (2011)
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma has been substantially improved by the addition of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab to chemotherapy regimens. We aimed to assess, in patients aged 18-59 years, the potential survival benefit provided by a dose-intensive immunochemotherapy regimen plus rituximab compared with standard treatment plus rituximab. METHODS: We did an open-label randomised trial comparing dose-intensive rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone (R-ACVBP) with subsequent consolidation versus standard rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). Random assignment was done with a computer-assisted randomisation-allocation sequence with a block size of four. Patients were aged 18-59 years with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and an age-adjusted international prognostic index equal to 1. Our primary endpoint was event-free survival. Our analyses of efficacy and safety were of the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00140595. FINDINGS: One patient withdrew consent before treatment and 54 did not complete treatment. After a median follow-up of 44 months, our 3-year estimate of event-free survival was 81% (95% CI 75-86) in the R-ACVBP group and 67% (59-73) in the R-CHOP group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·56, 95% CI 0·38-0·83; p=0·0035). 3-year estimates of progression-free survival (87% [95% CI, 81-91] vs 73% [66-79]; HR 0·48 [0·30-0·76]; p=0·0015) and overall survival (92% [87-95] vs 84% [77-89]; HR 0·44 [0·28-0·81]; p=0·0071) were also increased in the R-ACVBP group. 82 (42%) of 196 patients in the R-ACVBP group experienced a serious adverse event compared with 28 (15%) of 183 in the R-CHOP group. Grade 3-4 haematological toxic effects were more common in the R-ACVBP group, with a higher proportion of patients experiencing a febrile neutropenic episode (38% [75 of 196] vs 9% [16 of 183]). INTERPRETATION

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
The Lancet, Vol. 378, no.9806, p. 1858-67 (2011)
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1130498208
Document Type :
Electronic Resource