Back to Search Start Over

Pilot reliability and validity of the stroke rehabilitation motivation scale

Authors :
Chan, Daniel KY, Clinical School - South Western Sydney, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW
Cordato, Dennis J, Clinical School - South Western Sydney, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW
White, Gregory Nicholas, Clinical School - South Western Sydney, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW
Chan, Daniel KY, Clinical School - South Western Sydney, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW
Cordato, Dennis J, Clinical School - South Western Sydney, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW
White, Gregory Nicholas, Clinical School - South Western Sydney, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

AimsThis study aimed to demonstrate reliability and validity of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale, a novel instrument designed to assess internal and external contributions to motivation. Many studies recognise motivation, in the everyday sense, as a factor affecting stroke rehabilitation, but there is no standard measure. There is also no agreement as to whether motivation in the post-stroke period is the same as the absence of depression, anxiety or stress; hence the need for an independent measure of motivation.MethodThe Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale was adapted from the 28-item Sports Motivation Scale, which in turn was developed according to the intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to motivation identified by Self-Determination Theory.The resulting Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale was tested in two stages. In the 28-item reliability stage, in a sample of 18 stroke patients from the stroke ward of Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, the scale was tested for Inter-rater reliability, scale reliability, and validity via comparison of high vs. low motivation groups according to a novel ‘motivation score’. The scale was shortened from 28-items (four per subscale) to 7 items (one per subscale) by selecting the most reliable items.The three intrinsic and extrinsic subscales were summed and averaged, and the amotivation score was subtracted from this to produce a ‘motivation score’, such that a person with a positive score had more motivation, either extrinsic or intrinsic, than they had amotivation.e.g. [ ( E + I )/2 – A ]In the 7-item reliability stage, a further 13 patients were recruited from Bankstown-Lidcombe and Liverpool Hospitals. The 7-item scale was tested for scale reliability, and for validity by comparison of high vs. low motivation groups as well as correlations between motivation score, anxiety, depression and stress, and rehabilitation outcomes.ResultsIn both the 28-item and 7-item stages the scale demonstrated

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1130301890
Document Type :
Electronic Resource