Back to Search Start Over

Updated geographic range maps for giraffe, Giraffa spp., throughout sub‐Saharan Africa, and implications of changing distributions for conservation

Authors :
O'Connor, David
Stacy‐dawes, Jenna
Muneza, Arthur
Fennessy, Julian
Gobush, Kathleen
Chase, Michael J.
Brown, Michael B.
Bracis, Chloe
Elkan, Paul
Zaberirou, Abdoul Razazk Moussa
Rabeil, Thomas
Rubenstein, Dan
Becker, Matthew S.
Phillips, Samantha
Stabach, Jared A.
Leimgruber, Peter
Glikman, Jenny A.
Ruppert, Kirstie
Masiaine, Symon
Mueller, Thomas
O'Connor, David
Stacy‐dawes, Jenna
Muneza, Arthur
Fennessy, Julian
Gobush, Kathleen
Chase, Michael J.
Brown, Michael B.
Bracis, Chloe
Elkan, Paul
Zaberirou, Abdoul Razazk Moussa
Rabeil, Thomas
Rubenstein, Dan
Becker, Matthew S.
Phillips, Samantha
Stabach, Jared A.
Leimgruber, Peter
Glikman, Jenny A.
Ruppert, Kirstie
Masiaine, Symon
Mueller, Thomas
Source :
Mammal Review (0305-1838) (Wiley), 2019-10 , Vol. 49 , N. 4 , P. 285-299
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Giraffe populations have declined in abundance by almost 40% over the last three decades, and the geographic ranges of the species (previously believed to be one, now defined as four species) have been significantly reduced or altered. With substantial changes in land uses, loss of habitat, declining abundance, translocations, and data gaps, the existing geographic range maps for giraffe need to be updated. We performed a review of existing giraffe range data, including aerial and ground observations of giraffe, existing geographic range maps, and available literature. The information we collected was discussed with and validated by subject‐matter experts. Our updates may serve to correct inaccuracies or omissions in the baseline map, or may reflect actual changes in the distribution of giraffe. Relative to the 2016 International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List Assessment range map, the updated geographic range maps show a 5.6% decline in the range area of all giraffe taxa combined. The ranges of Giraffa camelopardalis (northern giraffe) and Giraffa tippelskirchi (Masai giraffe) decreased in area by 37% (122432 km2) and 4.7% (20816 km2) respectively, whereas 14% (41696 km2) of the range of Giraffa reticulata (reticulated giraffe) had not been included in the original geographic range map and has now been added. The range of Giraffa giraffa (southern giraffe) showed little overall change; it increased by 0.1% (419 km2). Ranges were larger than previously reported in six of the 21 range countries (Botswana, Ethiopia, Mozambique, South Sudan, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe), had declined in seven (Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Malawi, Niger, Uganda, and Zambia) and remained unchanged in seven (Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo, eSwatini, Namibia, Rwanda, Somalia, and South Africa). In Kenya, the ranges of both Giraffa tippelskirchi and Giraffa camelopardalis decreased, but the range of Giraffa reticulata was larger than previously believed. Our updated

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Mammal Review (0305-1838) (Wiley), 2019-10 , Vol. 49 , N. 4 , P. 285-299
Notes :
application/pdf, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1114595588
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111.mam.12165