Back to Search Start Over

Persistent pain after wrist or hand fracture: Development and validation of a prognostic model

Authors :
Harrington, Flavia
Cashin, A.
Traeger, A.
Hübscher, M.
Lorimer Moseley, G.
Parkitny, L.
Mcauley, J.
Harrington, Flavia
Cashin, A.
Traeger, A.
Hübscher, M.
Lorimer Moseley, G.
Parkitny, L.
Mcauley, J.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Worldwide, the incidence of wrist fracture is increasing. There are currently no externally validated prognostic models to inform early decision making for these patients. Objectives: To develop and validate a prognostic model from a comprehensive range of candidate prognostic factors that can identify patients who are at risk of developing persistent pain following wrist or hand fracture. Methods: We developed and validated a prognostic model using secondary data derived from a prospective cohort study (n = 715), with recruitment sites in 3 metropolitan hospitals in Sydney, Australia. The primary outcome was persistent pain 4 months following the injury. The current study used a backward stepwise regression analysis to develop the model in 2 hospitals (n = 408) and externally validate it in a third hospital (n = 307). To determine the accuracy of the model, we assessed calibration and discrimination in accordance with the PROGnosis RESearch Strategy framework. Results: Complete data were available for 95% of the cohort. Of 14 candidate variables, the final model contained 2 prognostic factors: patient age and pain intensity reported at initial presentation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.63 (95% confidence interval: 0.56, 0.69) in the development sample and 0.61 (95% confidence interval: 0.51, 0.70) in the validation sample. The model systematically overestimated risk (intercept, −1.13; slope, 0.73). Conclusion: We developed and externally validated a prognostic model to predict persistent pain 4 months after a wrist or hand fracture. Future studies are needed to assess whether the accuracy of this model can be improved by updating and validating it in local settings. Level of Evidence: Prognosis, level 1b.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1111084873
Document Type :
Electronic Resource