Back to Search Start Over

Multiple component patient safety intervention in English hospitals:controlled evaluation of second phase

Authors :
Benning, Amirta
Dixon-Woods, Mary
Nwulu, Ugochi
Ghaleb, Maisoon
Dawson, Jeremy
Barber, Nick
Frankin, Bryony D.
Girling, Alan
Hemming, Karla
Carmalt, Martin
Rudge, Gavin
Naicker, Thirumalai
Kotecha, Amit
Derrington, M. Clare
Lilford, Richard
Benning, Amirta
Dixon-Woods, Mary
Nwulu, Ugochi
Ghaleb, Maisoon
Dawson, Jeremy
Barber, Nick
Frankin, Bryony D.
Girling, Alan
Hemming, Karla
Carmalt, Martin
Rudge, Gavin
Naicker, Thirumalai
Kotecha, Amit
Derrington, M. Clare
Lilford, Richard
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Objective: To independently evaluate the impact of the second phase of the Health Foundation's Safer Patients Initiative (SPI2) on a range of patient safety measures. Design: A controlled before and after design. Five substudies: survey of staff attitudes; review of case notes from high risk (respiratory) patients in medical wards; review of case notes from surgical patients; indirect evaluation of hand hygiene by measuring hospital use of handwashing materials; measurement of outcomes (adverse events, mortality among high risk patients admitted to medical wards, patients' satisfaction, mortality in intensive care, rates of hospital acquired infection). Setting: NHS hospitals in England. Participants: Nine hospitals participating in SPI2 and nine matched control hospitals. Intervention The SPI2 intervention was similar to the SPI1, with somewhat modified goals, a slightly longer intervention period, and a smaller budget per hospital. Results: One of the scores (organisational climate) showed a significant (P=0.009) difference in rate of change over time, which favoured the control hospitals, though the difference was only 0.07 points on a five point scale. Results of the explicit case note reviews of high risk medical patients showed that certain practices improved over time in both control and SPI2 hospitals (and none deteriorated), but there were no significant differences between control and SPI2 hospitals. Monitoring of vital signs improved across control and SPI2 sites. This temporal effect was significant for monitoring the respiratory rate at both the six hour (adjusted odds ratio 2.1, 99% confidence interval 1.0 to 4.3; P=0.010) and 12 hour (2.4, 1.1 to 5.0; P=0.002) periods after admission. There was no significant effect of SPI for any of the measures of vital signs. Use of a recommended system for scoring the severity of pneumonia improved from 1.9% (1/52) to 21.4% (12/56) of control and from 2.0% (1/50) to 41.7% (25/60) of SPI2 patients. This temporal ch

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1110510883
Document Type :
Electronic Resource