Back to Search Start Over

Developing new ways of measuring the quality and impact of ambulance service care: the PhOEBE mixed-methods research programme

Authors :
Turner, Janette
Siriwardena, Niro
Coster, Joanne
Jacques, Richard
Irving, Andy
Crum, Annabel
Bell Gorrod, Helen
Nicholl, Jon
Phung, Viet-Hai
Togher, Fiona
Wilson, Richard
O'Cathain, Alicia
Booth, Andrew
Bradbury, Daniel
Goodacre, Steve
Spaight, Anne
Shewan, Jane
Pilbery, Richard
Fall, Daniel
Marsh, Maggie
Broadway-Parkinson, Andrea
Lyons, Ronan
Snooks, Helen
Campbell, Mike
Turner, Janette
Siriwardena, Niro
Coster, Joanne
Jacques, Richard
Irving, Andy
Crum, Annabel
Bell Gorrod, Helen
Nicholl, Jon
Phung, Viet-Hai
Togher, Fiona
Wilson, Richard
O'Cathain, Alicia
Booth, Andrew
Bradbury, Daniel
Goodacre, Steve
Spaight, Anne
Shewan, Jane
Pilbery, Richard
Fall, Daniel
Marsh, Maggie
Broadway-Parkinson, Andrea
Lyons, Ronan
Snooks, Helen
Campbell, Mike

Abstract

Background Ambulance service quality measures have focused on response times and a small number of emergency conditions, such as cardiac arrest. These quality measures do not reflect the care for the wide range of problems that ambulance services respond to and the Prehospital Outcomes for Evidence Based Evaluation (PhOEBE) programme sought to address this. Objectives The aim was to develop new ways of measuring the impact of ambulance service care by reviewing and synthesising literature on prehospital ambulance outcome measures and using consensus methods to identify measures for further development; creating a data set linking routinely collected ambulance service, hospital and mortality data; and using the linked data to explore the development of case-mix adjustment models to assess differences or changes in processes and outcomes resulting from ambulance service care. Design A mixed-methods study using a systematic review and synthesis of performance and outcome measures reported in policy and research literature; qualitative interviews with ambulance service users; a three-stage consensus process to identify candidate indicators; the creation of a data set linking ambulance, hospital and mortality data; and statistical modelling of the linked data set to produce novel case-mix adjustment measures of ambulance service quality. Setting East Midlands and Yorkshire, England. Participants Ambulance services, patients, public, emergency care clinical academics, commissioners and policy-makers between 2011 and 2015. Interventions None. Main outcome measures Ambulance performance and quality measures. Data sources Ambulance call-and-dispatch and electronic patient report forms, Hospital Episode Statistics, accident and emergency and inpatient data, and Office for National Statistics mortality data. Results Seventy-two candidate measures were generated from systematic reviews in four categories: (1) ambulance service operations (n = 14), (2) clinical management of pat

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, Turner, Janette, Siriwardena, Niro, Coster, Joanne, Jacques, Richard, Irving, Andy, Crum, Annabel, Bell Gorrod, Helen, Nicholl, Jon, Phung, Viet-Hai, Togher, Fiona, Wilson, Richard, O'Cathain, Alicia, Booth, Andrew, Bradbury, Daniel, Goodacre, Steve, Spaight, Anne, Shewan, Jane, Pilbery, Richard, Fall, Daniel, Marsh, Maggie, Broadway-Parkinson, Andrea, Lyons, Ronan, Snooks, Helen and Campbell, Mike (2019) Developing new ways of measuring the quality and impact of ambulance service care: the PhOEBE mixed-methods research programme. Project Report. National Institute for Health Research, Programme Grants for Applied Research., English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1106145627
Document Type :
Electronic Resource