Back to Search Start Over

Impact of machine log-files uncertainties on the quality assurance of proton pencil beam scanning treatment delivery

Authors :
UCL - SSS/IREC/MIRO - Pôle d'imagerie moléculaire, radiothérapie et oncologie
Toscano, S.
Souris, Kevin
Gomà, C.
Barragan Montero, Ana Maria
Puydupin, S.
Stappen, F.V.
Janssens, G.
Matic, A.
Geets, Xavier
Sterpin, Edmond
UCL - SSS/IREC/MIRO - Pôle d'imagerie moléculaire, radiothérapie et oncologie
Toscano, S.
Souris, Kevin
Gomà, C.
Barragan Montero, Ana Maria
Puydupin, S.
Stappen, F.V.
Janssens, G.
Matic, A.
Geets, Xavier
Sterpin, Edmond
Source :
Physics in medicine and biology, Vol. 64, no.9, p. 095021 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Irradiation log-files store useful information about the plan delivery, and together with independent Monte Carlo dose engine calculations can be used to reduce the time needed for patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA). Nonetheless, machine log-files carry an uncertainty associated to the measurement of the spot position and intensity that can influence the correct evaluation of the quality of the treatment delivery. This work addresses the problem of the inclusion of these uncertainties for the final verification of the treatment delivery. Dedicated measurements performed in an IBA Proteus Plus gantry with a pencil beam scanning (PBS) dedicated nozzle have been carried out to build a 'room-dependent' model of the spot position uncertainties. The model has been obtained through interpolation of the look-up tables describing the systematic and random uncertainties, and it has been tested for a clinical case of a brain cancer patient irradiated in a dry-run. The delivered dose has been compared with the planned dose with the inclusion of the errors obtained applying the model. Our results suggest that the accuracy of the treatment delivery is higher than the spot position uncertainties obtained from the log-file records. The comparison in terms of DVHs shows that the log-reconstructed dose is compatible with the planned dose within the 95% confidence interval obtained applying our model. The initial mean dose difference between the calculated dose to the patient based on the plan and recorded data is around 1%. The difference is essentially due to the log-file uncertainties and it can be removed with a correct treatment of these errors. In conclusion our new PSQA protocol allows for a fast verification of the dose delivered after every treatment fraction through the use of machine log-files and an independent Monte Carlo dose engine. Moreover, the inclusion of log-file uncertainties in the dose calculation allows for a correct evaluation of the quality of the trea

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Physics in medicine and biology, Vol. 64, no.9, p. 095021 (2019)
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1104520146
Document Type :
Electronic Resource