Back to Search Start Over

Uterine monitoring techniques from patients' and users' perspectives

Authors :
Thijssen, Kirsten M.J.
Vlemminx, Marion W.C.
Westerhuis, Michelle E.M.H.
Dieleman, Jeanne P.
van der Hout-van der Jagt, M. Beatrijs
Oei, S. Guid
Thijssen, Kirsten M.J.
Vlemminx, Marion W.C.
Westerhuis, Michelle E.M.H.
Dieleman, Jeanne P.
van der Hout-van der Jagt, M. Beatrijs
Oei, S. Guid
Source :
AJP Reports vol.8 (2018) date: 2018-07-01 nr.3 p.e184-e191 [ISSN 2157-6998]
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objective To evaluate preferences from patients and users on 3 uterine monitoring techniques, during labor. Study Design Women in term labor were simultaneously monitored with the intrauterine pressure catheter, the external tocodynamometer, and the electrohysterograph. Postpartum, these women filled out a questionnaire evaluating their preferences and important aspects. Nurses completed a questionnaire evaluating users' preferences. Results Of all 52 participating women, 80.8% preferred the electrohysterograph, 17.3% the intrauterine pressure catheter and 1.9% the external tocodynamometer. For these women, the electrohysterograph scored best regarding application and presence during labor (p < 0.001). Most important aspects were least likely to harm and least discomfort. Of 57 nurses, 40.4% preferred the electrohysterograph, 35.1% the external tocodynamometer, and 24.6% had no preference, or replied that their preference is subject to situation and patient. Conclusion Patients prefer the electrohysterograph over the external tocodynamometer and the intrauterine pressure catheter, while healthcare providers report ambiguous results.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
AJP Reports vol.8 (2018) date: 2018-07-01 nr.3 p.e184-e191 [ISSN 2157-6998]
Notes :
Thijssen, Kirsten M.J.
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1056951256
Document Type :
Electronic Resource