Back to Search Start Over

Ethics and involuntary treatment for Anorexia Nervosa in context: a social work approach

Authors :
Hugman, Richard, Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW
James, Kerrie, Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW
Kendall, Sacha, Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW
Hugman, Richard, Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW
James, Kerrie, Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW
Kendall, Sacha, Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

The ethics debate in the literature on involuntary treatment for anorexia nervosa (AN) is underpinned by biomedical ethics approaches. Biomedical ethics assigns expert status to professionals to objectively balance ethical principles in patients’ best interests. The debate is centred on the issue of how to respect the autonomy of patients with AN who refuse treatment whilst protecting them from harm. However, in practice, decision making about the ethics of involuntary treatment for AN occurs in a multidisciplinary context. Thus, it is surprising that there are no non-biomedical contributions to the debate. The aim of this research is to address this limitation by making a social work contribution.Social work ethics is compatible with biomedical ethics. However, social work ethics emphasises professional responsibility for promoting client empowerment, participation, and self-determination. Yet, similarly to biomedical ethics principles, social work values are presented as one-dimensional and objective. This obscures the complexity of conceptualising and applying professional values in practice (with persons with AN who refuse treatment). Further, this bypasses the issue that the interpretation of professional values and principles occurs in the context of team dynamics where particular discourses of ‘professionalism’ and ‘good practice’ operate. These discourses affirm particular knowledge and values.Taking a social work approach, it is imperative to reveal the moral dimension of practice and how professional discourses and practice can be disempowering for patients. In order to make this social work contribution to the debate a postmodern ethics approach has been applied. This approach promotes professional moral responsibility for (the hegemony of) professional knowledge. Consistent with this approach, an ethnographic study in the involuntary treatment environment was also conducted. This involved observation of eating disorders team meetings, in-depth interviewi

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1031061980
Document Type :
Electronic Resource