Back to Search Start Over

Guidance on the assessment of the biological relevance of data in scientific assessments

Authors :
Hardy, Anthony
Benford, Diane
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Jeger, Michael John
Knutsen, Helle Katrine
More, Simon
Naegeli, Hanspeter; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5762-1359
Noteborn, Hubert
Ockleford, Colin
Ricci, Antonia
Rychen, Guido
Schlatter, Josef R
Silano, Vittorio
Solecki, Roland
Turck, Dominique
Younes, Maged
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Griffin, John
Hougaard Benekou, Susanne
van Loveren, Henk
Luttik, Robert
Messean, Antoine
Penninks, André
Ru, Giuseppe
Stegeman, Jan Arend
van der Werf, Wopke
Westendorf, Johannes
Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius
Barizzone, Fulvio
Bottex, Bernard
et al
Hardy, Anthony
Benford, Diane
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Jeger, Michael John
Knutsen, Helle Katrine
More, Simon
Naegeli, Hanspeter; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5762-1359
Noteborn, Hubert
Ockleford, Colin
Ricci, Antonia
Rychen, Guido
Schlatter, Josef R
Silano, Vittorio
Solecki, Roland
Turck, Dominique
Younes, Maged
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Griffin, John
Hougaard Benekou, Susanne
van Loveren, Henk
Luttik, Robert
Messean, Antoine
Penninks, André
Ru, Giuseppe
Stegeman, Jan Arend
van der Werf, Wopke
Westendorf, Johannes
Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius
Barizzone, Fulvio
Bottex, Bernard
et al
Source :
Hardy, Anthony; Benford, Diane; Halldorsson, Thorhallur; Jeger, Michael John; Knutsen, Helle Katrine; More, Simon; Naegeli, Hanspeter; Noteborn, Hubert; Ockleford, Colin; Ricci, Antonia; Rychen, Guido; Schlatter, Josef R; Silano, Vittorio; Solecki, Roland; Turck, Dominique; Younes, Maged; Bresson, Jean‐Louis; Griffin, John; Hougaard Benekou, Susanne; van Loveren, Henk; Luttik, Robert; Messean, Antoine; Penninks, André; Ru, Giuseppe; Stegeman, Jan Arend; van der Werf, Wopke; Westendorf, Johannes; Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius; Barizzone, Fulvio; Bottex, Bernard; et al (2017). Guidance on the assessment of the biological relevance of data in scientific assessments. EFSA Journal, 15(8):e04970.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

EFSA requested its Scientific Committee to prepare a guidance document providing generic issues and criteria to consider biological relevance, particularly when deciding on whether an observed effect is of biological relevance, i.e. is adverse (or shows a beneficial health effect) or not. The guidance document provides a general framework for establishing the biological relevance of observations at various stages of the assessment. Biological relevance is considered at three main stages related to the process of dealing with evidence: Development of the assessment strategy. In this context, specification of agents, effects, subjects and conditions in relation to the assessment question(s): Collection and extraction of data; Appraisal and integration of the relevance of the agents, subjects, effects and conditions, i.e. reviewing dimensions of biological relevance for each data set. A decision tree is developed to assist in the collection, identification and appraisal of relevant data for a given specific assessment question to be answered.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Hardy, Anthony; Benford, Diane; Halldorsson, Thorhallur; Jeger, Michael John; Knutsen, Helle Katrine; More, Simon; Naegeli, Hanspeter; Noteborn, Hubert; Ockleford, Colin; Ricci, Antonia; Rychen, Guido; Schlatter, Josef R; Silano, Vittorio; Solecki, Roland; Turck, Dominique; Younes, Maged; Bresson, Jean‐Louis; Griffin, John; Hougaard Benekou, Susanne; van Loveren, Henk; Luttik, Robert; Messean, Antoine; Penninks, André; Ru, Giuseppe; Stegeman, Jan Arend; van der Werf, Wopke; Westendorf, Johannes; Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius; Barizzone, Fulvio; Bottex, Bernard; et al (2017). Guidance on the assessment of the biological relevance of data in scientific assessments. EFSA Journal, 15(8):e04970.
Notes :
application/pdf, info:doi/10.5167/uzh-144643, English, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1030049765
Document Type :
Electronic Resource