Back to Search Start Over

Randomised controlled trial of a digitally assisted low intensity intervention to promote personal recovery in persisting psychosis: SMART-Therapy study protocol

Authors :
Thomas, Neil
Farhall, John
Foley, Fiona
Rossell, Susan L.
Castle, David
Ladd, Emma
Meyer, Denny
Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
Leitan, Nuwan
Nunan, Cassy
Frankish, Rosalie
Smark, Tara
Farnan, Sue
McLeod, Bronte
Sterling, Leon
Murray, Greg
Fossey, Ellie
Brophy, Lisa
Kyrios, Michael
Thomas, Neil
Farhall, John
Foley, Fiona
Rossell, Susan L.
Castle, David
Ladd, Emma
Meyer, Denny
Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
Leitan, Nuwan
Nunan, Cassy
Frankish, Rosalie
Smark, Tara
Farnan, Sue
McLeod, Bronte
Sterling, Leon
Murray, Greg
Fossey, Ellie
Brophy, Lisa
Kyrios, Michael
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial interventions have an important role in promoting recovery in people with persisting psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia. Readily available, digital technology provides a means of developing therapeutic resources for use together by practitioners and mental health service users. As part of the Self-Management and Recovery Technology (SMART) research program, we have developed an online resource providing materials on illness self-management and personal recovery based on the Connectedness-Hope-Identity-Meaning-Empowerment (CHIME) framework. Content is communicated using videos featuring persons with lived experience of psychosis discussing how they have navigated issues in their own recovery. This was developed to be suitable for use on a tablet computer during sessions with a mental health worker to promote discussion about recovery. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a rater-blinded randomised controlled trial comparing a low intensity recovery intervention of eight one-to-one face-to-face sessions with a mental health worker using the SMART website alongside routine care, versus an eight-session comparison condition, befriending. The recruitment target is 148 participants with a schizophrenia-related disorder or mood disorder with a history of psychosis, recruited from mental health services in Victoria, Australia. Following baseline assessment, participants are randomised to intervention, and complete follow up assessments at 3, 6 and 9 months post-baseline. The primary outcome is personal recovery measured using the Process of Recovery Questionnaire (QPR). Secondary outcomes include positive and negative symptoms assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, subjective experiences of psychosis, emotional symptoms, quality of life and resource use. Mechanisms of change via effects on self-stigma and self-efficacy will be examined. DISCUSSION: This protocol describes a novel intervention which tests new t

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
12 p., English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.ocn979244962
Document Type :
Electronic Resource