Back to Search Start Over

Histopathology of aortic complications in bicuspid aortic valve versus Marfan syndrome: relevance for therapy?

Authors :
Grewal, N. (Nimrat)
Franken, R. (Romy)
Mulder, B.J.M. (Barbara)
Goumans, M.-J. (Marie-José)
Lindeman, J.H.N. (Johannes)
Jongbloed, M.R.M. (Monique)
DeRuiter, M.C. (Marco)
Klautz, R.J.M. (Robert)
Bogers, A.J.J.C. (Ad)
Poelmann, R.E. (Robert)
Gittenberger-de Groot, A.C. (Adriana)
Grewal, N. (Nimrat)
Franken, R. (Romy)
Mulder, B.J.M. (Barbara)
Goumans, M.-J. (Marie-José)
Lindeman, J.H.N. (Johannes)
Jongbloed, M.R.M. (Monique)
DeRuiter, M.C. (Marco)
Klautz, R.J.M. (Robert)
Bogers, A.J.J.C. (Ad)
Poelmann, R.E. (Robert)
Gittenberger-de Groot, A.C. (Adriana)
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) are more prone to develop aortic dilation and dissection compared to persons with a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). To elucidate potential common and distinct pathways of clinical relevance, we compared the histopathological substrates of aortopathy. Ascending aortic wall biopsies were divided in five groups: BAV (n = 36) and TAV (n = 23) without and with dilation and non-dilated MFS (n = 8). General histologic features, apoptosis, the expre

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, Heart and Vessels vol. 31 no. 5, pp. 795-806, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.ocn957102337
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007.s00380-015-0703-z