Back to Search Start Over

Clinical outcomes after zotarolimus and everolimus drug eluting stent implantation in coronary artery bifurcation lesions: Insights from the RESOLUTE All Comers Trial

Authors :
Diletti, R. (Roberto)
Garcia-Garcia, H.M. (Hector)
Bourantas, C.V. (Christos)
Geuns, R.J.M. (Robert Jan) van
Mieghem, N.M. (Nicolas) van
Vranckx, P. (Pascal)
Zhang, Y. (Yaojun)
Farooq, V. (Vasim)
Iqbal, A. (Anwarul)
Wykrzykowska, J.J. (Joanna)
Vries, T. (Ton) de
Swart, M. (Michael)
Teunissen, Y.
Negoita, M. (Manuela)
Leeuwen, F. (Frank) van
Silber, S. (Sigmund)
Windecker, S.W. (Stephan)
Serruys, P.W.J.C. (Patrick)
Diletti, R. (Roberto)
Garcia-Garcia, H.M. (Hector)
Bourantas, C.V. (Christos)
Geuns, R.J.M. (Robert Jan) van
Mieghem, N.M. (Nicolas) van
Vranckx, P. (Pascal)
Zhang, Y. (Yaojun)
Farooq, V. (Vasim)
Iqbal, A. (Anwarul)
Wykrzykowska, J.J. (Joanna)
Vries, T. (Ton) de
Swart, M. (Michael)
Teunissen, Y.
Negoita, M. (Manuela)
Leeuwen, F. (Frank) van
Silber, S. (Sigmund)
Windecker, S.W. (Stephan)
Serruys, P.W.J.C. (Patrick)
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Objective We investigated clinical outcomes after treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with second generation drug eluting stents (DES). Design Post hoc analysis of a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Setting Multicentre study. Patients All comers study with minimal exclusion criteria. Interventions Patients were treated with either zotarolimus or everolimus eluting stents. The patient population was divided according to treatment of bifurcation or non-bifurcation lesions and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Main outcomes measures Clinical outcomes within 2-year follow-up. Results A total of 2265 patients were included in the present analysis. Two-year follow-up data were available in 2223 patients: 1838 patients in the non-bifurcation group and 385 patients in the bifurcation group. At 2-year follow-up the bifurcation and the non-bifurcation lesion groups showed no significant differences in terms of cardiac death (2.3 vs 2.1, p=0.273), target lesion failure (9.7% vs 13.8%, p=0.255), major adverse cardiac events (11.5% vs 15.1%, p=0.305), target lesion revascularisation (4.7% vs 6.0%, p=0.569), and definite or probable ste

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
Heart vol. 99 no. 17, pp. 1267-1274, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.ocn929964371
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136.heartjnl-2013-303778