Back to Search Start Over

HUMeral Shaft Fractures: MEasuring Recovery after Operative versus Non-operative Treatment (HUMMER): A multicenter comparative observational study

Authors :
Mahabier, K.C. (Kiran)
Lieshout, E.M.M. (Esther) van
Bolhuis, H.W. (Hugo)
Bos, P.K. (Koen)
Bronkhorst, M.W.G.A. (Maarten)
Bruijninckx, M.M.M. (Milko)
Haan, J. (Jeroen) de
Deenik, W. (Wendy)
Dwars, B.J. (Boudewijn)
Eversdijk, M.G. (Martin)
Goslings, J.C. (Carel)
Haverlag, R. (Robert)
Heetveld, M.J. (Martin)
Kerver, A.J.H. (Albert J.H.)
Kolkman, K.A. (Karel)
Leenhouts, K. (Kees)
Meylaerts, S.A.G. (Sven)
Poeze, H.
Poolman, R.W. (Rudolf)
Punt, B.J. (Bas)
Roerdink, W.H. (Herbert)
Roukema, G.R. (Gert)
Sintenie, J.B. (Jan Bernard)
Soesman, N.M.R. (Nicolaj)
Tanka, A.F.K. (Andras)
Holder, E.J.T. (Edgar) ten
Elst, M. (Maarten) van der
Heijden, F.H.W.M. (Frank) van der
Linden, F.M. (Frits) van der
Zwaal, P. (Peer) van der
Dijk, J.P. (Johannes) van
Jonbergen, H.P.W. van
Verleisdonk, E.J.M.M. (Egbert)
Vroemen, J.P.A.M. (Jos)
Waleboer, M. (Marco)
Wittich, P. (Philippe)
Zuidema, W.P. (Wietse)
Polinder, S. (Suzanne)
Verhofstad, M.H.J. (Michiel)
Hartog, D. (Dennis) den
Onstenk, R. (Ron)
Mahabier, K.C. (Kiran)
Lieshout, E.M.M. (Esther) van
Bolhuis, H.W. (Hugo)
Bos, P.K. (Koen)
Bronkhorst, M.W.G.A. (Maarten)
Bruijninckx, M.M.M. (Milko)
Haan, J. (Jeroen) de
Deenik, W. (Wendy)
Dwars, B.J. (Boudewijn)
Eversdijk, M.G. (Martin)
Goslings, J.C. (Carel)
Haverlag, R. (Robert)
Heetveld, M.J. (Martin)
Kerver, A.J.H. (Albert J.H.)
Kolkman, K.A. (Karel)
Leenhouts, K. (Kees)
Meylaerts, S.A.G. (Sven)
Poeze, H.
Poolman, R.W. (Rudolf)
Punt, B.J. (Bas)
Roerdink, W.H. (Herbert)
Roukema, G.R. (Gert)
Sintenie, J.B. (Jan Bernard)
Soesman, N.M.R. (Nicolaj)
Tanka, A.F.K. (Andras)
Holder, E.J.T. (Edgar) ten
Elst, M. (Maarten) van der
Heijden, F.H.W.M. (Frank) van der
Linden, F.M. (Frits) van der
Zwaal, P. (Peer) van der
Dijk, J.P. (Johannes) van
Jonbergen, H.P.W. van
Verleisdonk, E.J.M.M. (Egbert)
Vroemen, J.P.A.M. (Jos)
Waleboer, M. (Marco)
Wittich, P. (Philippe)
Zuidema, W.P. (Wietse)
Polinder, S. (Suzanne)
Verhofstad, M.H.J. (Michiel)
Hartog, D. (Dennis) den
Onstenk, R. (Ron)
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Background: Fractures of the humeral shaft are associated with a profound temporary (and in the elderly sometimes even permanent) impairment of independence and quality of life. These fractures can be treated operatively or non-operatively, but the optimal tailored treatment is an unresolved problem. As no high-quality comparative randomized or observational studies are available, a recent Cochrane review concluded there is no evidence of sufficient scientific quality available to inform the decision to operate or not. Since randomized controlled trials for this injury have shown feasibility issues, this study is designed to provide the best achievable evidence to answer this unresolved problem. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate functional recovery after operative versus non-operative treatment in adult patients who sustained a humeral shaft fracture. Secondary aims include the effect of treatment on pain, complications, generic health-related quality of life, time to resumption of activities of daily living and work, and cost-effectiveness. The main hypothesis is that operative treatment will result in faster recovery. Methods/design. The design of the study will be a multicenter prospective observational study of 400 patients who have sustained a humeral shaft fracture, AO type 12A or 12B. Treatment decision (i.e., operative or non-operative) will be left to the discretion of the treating surgeon. Critical elements of treatment will be registered and outcome will be monitored at regular intervals over the subsequent 12 months. The primary outcome measure is the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. Secondary outcome measures are the Constant score, pain level at both sides, range of motion of the elbow and shoulder joint at both sides, radiographic healing, rate of complications and (secondary) interventions, health-related quality of life (Short-Form 36 and EuroQol-5D), time to resumption of ADL/work, and cost-effectiveness. Data will be a

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
application/pdf, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders vol. 15 no. 1, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.ocn929956287
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186.1471-2474-15-39