Cost benefit analysis: closed-cell polyurethane foam use in DoD forward-deployed structures, and as an alternative building material, to reduce operational fuel demand and associated costs

MLA

Arkes, Jeremy, et al. Cost Benefit Analysis: Closed-Cell Polyurethane Foam Use in DoD Forward-Deployed Structures, and as an Alternative Building Material, to Reduce Operational Fuel Demand and Associated Costs. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsoai&AN=edsoai.ocn919411973&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887. Accessed 11 Feb. 2025.

APA

Arkes, J., Landry, S., Graduate School of Business and Public Policy (GSBPP), Marsh, R. J., Caballero, S. L., & Gerry, S. D. (n.d.). Cost benefit analysis: closed-cell polyurethane foam use in DoD forward-deployed structures, and as an alternative building material, to reduce operational fuel demand and associated costs.

Chicago

Arkes, Jeremy, Steven Landry, Graduate School of Business and Public Policy (GSBPP), Robert J. Marsh, Steven L. Caballero, and Stephen D. Gerry. 2025. “Cost Benefit Analysis: Closed-Cell Polyurethane Foam Use in DoD Forward-Deployed Structures, and as an Alternative Building Material, to Reduce Operational Fuel Demand and Associated Costs.” Accessed February 11. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsoai&AN=edsoai.ocn919411973&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.