Back to Search Start Over

Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Authors :
Cavé, Hélène
van der Werff Ten Bosch, Jutte
Suciu, Stefan
Guidal, Christine
Waterkeyn, Christine
Otten, Jacques
Bakkus, Marleen
Thielemans, Kris M.
Grandchamp, Bernard
Vilmer, Etienne
Nelken, Brigitte
Fournier, Martine
Boutard, Patrick
Lebrun, Emmanuel
Méchinaud, Françoise
Garand, Richard
Robert, Alain
Dastugue, Nicole
Plouvier, Emmanuel
Racador, Evelyn
Ferster, Alina
Gyselinck, Jan
Fenneteau, Odile
Duval, Michel
Solbu, Gabriel
Manel, Anne-Marie
Cavé, Hélène
van der Werff Ten Bosch, Jutte
Suciu, Stefan
Guidal, Christine
Waterkeyn, Christine
Otten, Jacques
Bakkus, Marleen
Thielemans, Kris M.
Grandchamp, Bernard
Vilmer, Etienne
Nelken, Brigitte
Fournier, Martine
Boutard, Patrick
Lebrun, Emmanuel
Méchinaud, Françoise
Garand, Richard
Robert, Alain
Dastugue, Nicole
Plouvier, Emmanuel
Racador, Evelyn
Ferster, Alina
Gyselinck, Jan
Fenneteau, Odile
Duval, Michel
Solbu, Gabriel
Manel, Anne-Marie
Source :
The New England journal of medicine, 339 (9
Publication Year :
1998

Abstract

Background and Methods: The implications of the detection of residual disease after treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are unclear. We conducted a prospective study at 11 centers to determine the predictive value of the presence or absence of detectable residual disease at several points in time during the first six months after complete remission of childhood ALL had been induced. Junctional sequences of T-cell-receptor or immunoglobulin gene rearrangements were used as clonal markers of leukemic cells. Residual disease was quantitated with a competitive polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) assay. Of 246 patients enrolled at diagnosis and treated with a uniform chemotherapy protocol, 178 were monitored for residual disease with one clone-specific probe (in 74 percent) or more than one probe (in 26 percent). The median follow-up period was 38 months. Results: The presence or absence and level of residual leukemia were significantly correlated with the risk of early relapse at each of the times studied (P<0.001). PCR measurements identified patients at high risk for relapse after the completion of induction therapy (those with ≤10-2 residual blasts per 2x105 mononuclear bone marrow cells) or at later time points (those with ≤10-3 residual blasts). Multivariate analysis showed that as compared with immunophenotype, age, risk group (standard or very high risk), and white-cell count at diagnosis, the presence or absence and level of residual disease were the most powerful independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: Residual leukemia after induction of a remission is a powerful prognostic factor in childhood ALL. Detection of residual disease by PCR should be used to identify patients at risk for relapse and should be taken into account in considering alternative treatment.<br />SCOPUS: ar.j<br />info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
The New England journal of medicine, 339 (9
Notes :
No full-text files, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.ocn893983287
Document Type :
Electronic Resource