Back to Search Start Over

Can commonly-used fan-driven air cleaning technologies improve indoor air quality? A literature review

Authors :
Zhang, Yinping
Mo, Jinhan
Li, Yuguo
Sundell, Jan
Wargocki, Pawel
Zhang, Jensen
Little, John C.
Corsi, Richard
Deng, Qihong
Leung, Michael H.K.
Fang, Lei
Chen, Wenhao
Li, Jinguang
Sun, Yuexia
Zhang, Yinping
Mo, Jinhan
Li, Yuguo
Sundell, Jan
Wargocki, Pawel
Zhang, Jensen
Little, John C.
Corsi, Richard
Deng, Qihong
Leung, Michael H.K.
Fang, Lei
Chen, Wenhao
Li, Jinguang
Sun, Yuexia
Source :
Zhang , Y , Mo , J , Li , Y , Sundell , J , Wargocki , P , Zhang , J , Little , J C , Corsi , R , Deng , Q , Leung , M H K , Fang , L , Chen , W , Li , J & Sun , Y 2011 , ' Can commonly-used fan-driven air cleaning technologies improve indoor air quality? A literature review ' , Atmospheric Environment , vol. 45 , no. 26 , pp. 4329-4343 .
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Air cleaning techniques have been applied worldwide with the goal of improving indoor air quality. The effectiveness of applying these techniques varies widely, and pollutant removal efficiency is usually determined in controlled laboratory environments which may not be realized in practice. Some air cleaners are largely ineffective, and some produce harmful by-products. To summarize what is known regarding the effectiveness of fan-driven air cleaning technologies, a state-of-the-art review of the scientific literature was undertaken by a multidisciplinary panel of experts from Europe, North America, and Asia with expertise in air cleaning, aerosol science, medicine, chemistry and ventilation. The effects on health were not examined. Over 26,000 articles were identified in major literature databases; 400 were selected as being relevant based on their titles and abstracts by the first two authors, who further reduced the number of articles to 160 based on the full texts. These articles were reviewed by the panel using predefined inclusion criteria during their first meeting. Additions were also made by the panel. Of these, 133 articles were finally selected for detailed review. Each article was assessed independently by two members of the panel and then judged by the entire panel during a consensus meeting. During this process 59 articles were deemed conclusive and their results were used for final reporting at their second meeting. The conclusions are that: (1) None of the reviewed technologies was able to effectively remove all indoor pollutants and many were found to generate undesirable by-products during operation. (2) Particle filtration and sorption of gaseous pollutants were among the most effective air cleaning technologies, but there is insufficient information regarding long-term performance and proper maintenance. (3) The existing data make it difficult to extract information such as Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR), which represents a common benchmark for

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Zhang , Y , Mo , J , Li , Y , Sundell , J , Wargocki , P , Zhang , J , Little , J C , Corsi , R , Deng , Q , Leung , M H K , Fang , L , Chen , W , Li , J & Sun , Y 2011 , ' Can commonly-used fan-driven air cleaning technologies improve indoor air quality? A literature review ' , Atmospheric Environment , vol. 45 , no. 26 , pp. 4329-4343 .
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.ocn826389672
Document Type :
Electronic Resource