Back to Search Start Over

Guided bone regeneration with a synthetic biodegradable membrane: a comparative study in dogs

Authors :
Jung, R E
Kokovic, V
Jurisic, M
Yaman, D
Subramani, K
Weber, Franz E; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1670-2296
Jung, R E
Kokovic, V
Jurisic, M
Yaman, D
Subramani, K
Weber, Franz E; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1670-2296
Source :
Jung, R E; Kokovic, V; Jurisic, M; Yaman, D; Subramani, K; Weber, Franz E (2011). Guided bone regeneration with a synthetic biodegradable membrane: a comparative study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 22(8):802-807.
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare a newly developed biodegradable polylactide/polyglycolide/N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (PLGA/NMP) membrane with a standard resorbable collagen membrane (RCM) in combination with and without the use of a bone substitute material (deproteinized bovine bone mineral [DBBM]) looking at the proposed tenting effect and bone regeneration. Materials and methods: In five adult German sheepdogs, the mandibular premolars P2, P3, P4, and the molar M1 were bilaterally extracted creating two bony defects on each site. A total of 20 dental implants were inserted and allocated to four different treatment modalities within each dog: PLGA/NMP membrane only (Test 1), PLGA/NMP membrane with DBBM (Test 2), RCM only (negative control), and RCM with DBBM (positive control). A histomorphometric analysis was performed 12 weeks after implantation. For statistical analysis, a Friedman test and subsequently a Wilcoxon signed ranks test were applied. Results: In four out of five PLGA/NMP membrane-treated defects, the membranes had broken into pieces without the support of DBBM. This led to a worse outcome than in the RCM group. In combination with DBBM, both membranes revealed similar amounts of area of bone regeneration and bone-to-implant contact without significant differences. On the level of the third implant thread, the PLGA/NMP membrane induced more horizontal bone formation beyond the graft than the RCM. Conclusion: The newly developed PLGA/NMP membrane performs equally well as the RCM when applied in combination with DBBM. Without bone substitute material, the PLGA/NMP membrane performed worse than the RCM in challenging defects, and therefore, a combination with a bone substitute material is recommended. To cite this article: Jung RE, Kokovic V, Jurisic M, Yaman D, Subramani K, Weber FE. Guided bone regeneration with a synthetic biodegradable membrane: a comparative study in dogs. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. xx, 2010; 000-000.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
Jung, R E; Kokovic, V; Jurisic, M; Yaman, D; Subramani, K; Weber, Franz E (2011). Guided bone regeneration with a synthetic biodegradable membrane: a comparative study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 22(8):802-807.
Notes :
application/pdf, info:doi/10.5167/uzh-43933, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.ocn733368463
Document Type :
Electronic Resource