Back to Search Start Over

An assessment of Earth's climate sensitivity using multiple lines of evidence

An assessment of Earth's climate sensitivity using multiple lines of evidence

Authors :
S. Sherwood
M. J. Webb
J. D. Annan
K. C. Armour
P. M. Forster
J. C. Hargreaves
G. Hegerl
S. A. Klein
K. D. Marvel
E. J. Rohling
M. Watanabe
T. Andrews
P. Braconnot
C. S. Bretherton
G. L. Foster
Z. Hausfather
A. S. von der Heydt
R. Knutti
T. Mauritsen
J. R. Norris
C. Proistosescu
M. Rugenstein
G. A. Schmidt
K. B. Tokarska
M. D. Zelinka
Source :
Reviews of Geophysics. 58(4)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
United States: NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI), 2020.

Abstract

We assess evidence relevant to Earth's equilibrium climate sensitivity per doubling of atmospheric CO2, characterized by an effective sensitivity S . This evidence includes feedback process understanding, the historical climate record, and the paleoclimate record. An S value lower than 2 K is difficult to reconcile with any of the three lines of evidence. The amount of cooling during the Last Glacial Maximum provides strong evidence against values of S greater than 4.5 K. Other lines of evidence in combination also show that this is relatively unlikely. We use a Bayesian approach to produce a probability density (PDF) for S given all the evidence, including tests of robustness to difficult‐to‐quantify uncertainties and different priors. The 66% range is 2.6‐3.9 K for our Baseline calculation, and remains within 2.3‐4.5 K under the robustness tests; corresponding 5‐95% ranges are 2.3‐4.7 K, bounded by 2.0‐5.7 K (although such high‐confidence ranges should be regarded more cautiously). This indicates a stronger constraint on S than reported in past assessments, by lifting the low end of the range. This narrowing occurs because the three lines of evidence agree and are judged to be largely independent, and because of greater confidence in understanding feedback processes and in combining evidence. We identify promising avenues for further narrowing the range in S , in particular using comprehensive models and process understanding to address limitations in the traditional forcing‐feedback paradigm for interpreting past changes.

Subjects

Subjects :
Meteorology And Climatology

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19449208 and 87551209
Volume :
58
Issue :
4
Database :
NASA Technical Reports
Journal :
Reviews of Geophysics
Notes :
509496.02.08.09.58, , DE-AC52-07NA27344
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsnas.20205004845
Document Type :
Report
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000678