DOES A BUYER REALLY HAVE THE 'LUXURY' OF INVOKING AN MAE CLAUSE? A (HYPOTHETICAL) MAE ANALYSIS OF THE LVMH-TIFFANY MERGER AFTER AKORN.

Authors :: Boeriu, Alexandra
Source :: Case Western Reserve Law Review. Spring, 2024, Vol. 74 Issue 3, pCOV6, 37 p.
Publication Year :: 2024
Abstract: CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 829 I. EXPLORING MAE CLAUSES 832 A. MAE Clauses in General 832 B. MAE Carve-Outs and the Disproportionate Effect Exception 834 II. TRACING BACK THE SELLER-FRIENDLY STANDARD 836 [...]

Subjects :: Exceptions (Law) -- Laws, regulations and rules
Luxuries -- Laws, regulations and rules -- Valuation
Material facts (Law) -- Laws, regulations and rules
Discharge of contracts -- Laws, regulations and rules
Acquisitions and mergers -- Laws, regulations and rules
Hexion Specialty Chemical, Inc. v. Huntsman Corp. (965 A.2d 715 (Del. Ch. 2008))
Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG (No. 2018-0300-JTL (Del. Ch. Oct. 1, 2018))
I.B.P., Inc., In re (789 A.2d 14 (Del. Ch. 2001))
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton S.A. -- Mergers, acquisitions and divestments
Tiffany & Co. -- Mergers, acquisitions and divestments
Government regulation
Company acquisition/merger

Tools