A BRIDGE TOO FAR: TERMINATING THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES WOULD HARM NATIONAL SECURITY AND CAUSE INEFFICIENT ADMINISTRATION OF MILITARY AND CIVILIAN JUSTICE.

Authors :: Hargis, Gregory R.
Source :: Journal of Appellate Practice and Process. Summer, 2024, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p169, 29 p.
Publication Year :: 2024
Abstract: This article is a rebuttal to Professor Eugene Fidell's article, (1) which calls for the termination of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (the CAAF) (2) [...]

Subjects :: National security -- Laws, regulations and rules
Military offenses -- Laws, regulations and rules
Subject matter jurisdiction -- Laws, regulations and rules
Military discipline -- Laws, regulations and rules
Military law -- Practice -- Evaluation
Courts-martial and courts of inquiry -- Laws, regulations and rules
Military trials -- Laws, regulations and rules
Appellate procedure -- Laws, regulations and rules
Due process of law -- Analysis
United States. Court of Appeals. District of Columbia Circuit -- Powers and duties -- Evaluation
United States. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces -- History -- Powers and duties -- Evaluation
Government regulation
Armed Forces Act (10 U.S.C. 876)
Military Justice Act of 1968
United States Constitution (U.S. Const. art. 1) (U.S. Const. art. 3)

Tools