Back to Search
Start Over
Unilateral Acquisition and the Requirements of Freedom: A Kantian Account of the Judicial Exceptions to Patent Protection
- Source :
- Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. August, 2022, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p459, 28 p.
- Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- For obscure reasons, courts exclude some statutorily patentable inventions ('judicial exceptions') from patent protection. These exclusions have been criticized for impeding innovation, contrary to the purpose of patent law. I argue that freedom requires these exclusions even if they impede innovation. Patents, like property, can be unilaterally acquired, limiting others' freedom without their consent. Kant explains why, to reconcile property with equal freedom, only rivalrous objects in acquirers' first possession can be unilaterally acquired. States can rightfully authorize unilateral acquisition of only these objects. Drawing from Kant, I explain how patent protection conflicts with equal freedom unless patented inventions involve inventive uses of rivalrous objects external to human bodies. Enabled by inventive concepts, these uses would be impossible without these concepts, and are thus in the first possession of their inventors. I then show how the most recent United States Supreme Court judicial exception decisions limit patent protection to inventive uses of rivalrous external objects.<br />'The Supreme Court has created a big problem and then made it worse with each successive decision...' (1) And what about 'exceptions' like natural laws and natural phenomena? Of course, [...]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 08418209
- Volume :
- 35
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Gale General OneFile
- Journal :
- Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence
- Publication Type :
- Periodical
- Accession number :
- edsgcl.723561213
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2022.10