Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of measures of medication adherence from pharmacy dispensing and insurer claims data

Authors :
Fontanet, Constance P.
Choudhry, Niteesh K.
Isaac, Thomas
Sequist, Thomas D.
Gopalakrishnan, Chandrasekar
Gagne, Joshua J.
Jackevicius, Cynthia A.
Fischer, Michael A.
Solomon, Daniel H.
Lauffenburger, Julie C.
Source :
Health Services Research. June, 2022, Vol. 57 Issue 3, p524, 13 p.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Objective: Medication nonadherence is linked to worsened clinical outcomes and increased costs. Existing system-level adherence interventions rely on insurer claims for patient identification and outcome measurement, yet suffer from incomplete capture and lags in data acquisition. Data from pharmacies regarding prescription filling, captured in retail dispensing, may be more efficient. Data Sources: Pharmacy fill and insurer claims data. Study Design: We compared adherence measured using pharmacy fill data to adherence using insurer claims data, expressed as proportion of days covered (PDC) over 12 months. Agreement was evaluated using correlation/validation metrics. We also explored the relationship between adherence in both sources and disease control using prediction modeling. Data Extraction Methods: Large pragmatic trial of cardiometabolic disease in an integrated delivery network. Principal Findings: Among 1113 patients, adherence was higher in pharmacy fill (mean = 50.0%) versus claims data (mean = 47.4%), although they had moderately high correlation (R = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.53-0.61) with most patients (86.9%) being similarly classified as adherent or nonadherent. Sensitivity and specificity of pharmacy fill versus claims data were high (0.89, 95% CI: 0.86-0.91 and 0.80, 95% CI: 0.75-0.85). Pharmacy fill-based PDC predicted better disease control slightly more than claimsbased PDC, although the difference was nonsignificant. Conclusions: Pharmacy fill data may be an alternative to insurer claims for adherence measurement. KEYWORDS adherence, claims, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, pharmacy What is known on this topic * Nonadherence to oral medications results in worsened clinical outcomes and higher costs. * While insurer claims are often used for adherence assessment, this data source can suffer from incomplete data capture and lags in data acquisition; by contrast, pharmacy fill data are thought to overcome these limitations but have not been rigorously compared. What this study adds * This study compares medication adherence in pharmacy fill data to adherence in insurer claims data. * Pharmacy fill data have equivalent ability to predict good disease control and may capture more data than insurer claims data. * Pharmacy fill data may be an alternative to insurer claims for adherence measurement.<br />1 | INTRODUCTION Nonadherence to evidence-based medications is extremely common and associated with worsened clinical outcomes and increased health care costs. (1-3) Consequently, adherence has become a key quality measure, [...]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00179124
Volume :
57
Issue :
3
Database :
Gale General OneFile
Journal :
Health Services Research
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
edsgcl.707524252
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13714