Presentist History for Pluralist Science

Building on my previous writings on presentism, pluralism, and 'complementary science', I develop an activist view of historiography. I begin by recognizing the inevitability of presentism. Our own purposes and perspectives do and should guide the production of our accounts of the past; like funerals, history-writing is for the living. There are different kinds of presentist history, depending on the historians' purposes and perspectives. My particular inclination is pluralist. Science remembers its own history from a particular perspective ('whiggism'), which views the past as imperfect versions of the present; if professional historians of science shared this perspective, our work would be redundant. Instead, we can make it our task to illuminate the aspects of the past of science that scientists themselves tend to ignore and forget. History of science can also take a more productive role in the creation and improvement of scientific knowledge. Scientific progress as we know it tends to involve the shutting down of alternative paths of inquiry, resulting in a loss of potential and actual knowledge. A critical and sympathetic engagement with the past allows us to recover the lost paths, which can also suggest new paths. These points will be illustrated by a number of examples, especially from the history of chemistry and physics, including the recovery and extension of past experiments.
Author(s): Hasok Chang [sup.1] Author Affiliations: (1) grid.5335.0, 0000000121885934, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, , CB2 3RH, Cambridge, UK Introduction In this [...]