Back to Search
Start Over
Pregnancy after bariatric surgery and adverse perinatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Source :
- PLoS Medicine. August 6, 2019, Vol. 16 Issue 8, e1002866
- Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Background Women who undergo bariatric surgery prior to pregnancy are less likely to experience comorbidities associated with obesity such as gestational diabetes and hypertension. However, bariatric surgery, particularly malabsorptive procedures, can make patients susceptible to deficiencies in nutrients that are essential for healthy fetal development. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the association between pregnancy after bariatric surgery and adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods and findings Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and Google Scholar from inception to June 2019, supplemented by hand-searching reference lists, citations, and journals. Observational studies comparing perinatal outcomes post-bariatric surgery to pregnancies without prior bariatric surgery were included. Outcomes of interest were perinatal mortality, congenital anomalies, preterm birth, postterm birth, small and large for gestational age (SGA/LGA), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Where data were available, results were subgrouped by type of bariatric surgery. We included 33 studies with 14,880 pregnancies post-bariatric surgery and 3,979,978 controls. Odds ratios (ORs) were increased after bariatric surgery (all types combined) for perinatal mortality (1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.85, p = 0.031), congenital anomalies (1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.59, p = 0.019), preterm birth (1.57, 95% CI 1.38-1.79, p < 0.001), and NICU admission (1.41, 95% CI 1.25-1.59, p < 0.001). Postterm birth decreased after bariatric surgery (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.60, p < 0.001). ORs for SGA increased (2.72, 95% CI 2.32-3.20, p < 0.001) and LGA decreased (0.24, 95% CI 0.14-0.41, p < 0.001) after gastric bypass but not after gastric banding. Babies born after bariatric surgery (all types combined) weighed over 200 g less than those born to mothers without prior bariatric surgery (weighted mean difference -242.42 g, 95% CI -307.43 to -177.40 g, p < 0.001). There was low heterogeneity for all outcomes (I.sup.2 < 40%) except LGA. Limitations of our study are that as a meta-analysis of existing studies, the results are limited by the quality of the included studies and available data, unmeasured confounders, and the small number of studies for some outcomes. Conclusions In our systematic review of observational studies, we found that bariatric surgery, especially gastric bypass, prior to pregnancy was associated with increased risk of some adverse perinatal outcomes. This suggests that women who have undergone bariatric surgery may benefit from specific preconception and pregnancy nutritional support and increased monitoring of fetal growth and development. Future studies should explore whether restrictive surgery results in better perinatal outcomes, compared to malabsorptive surgery, without compromising maternal outcomes. If so, these may be the preferred surgery for women of reproductive age. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42017051537.<br />Author(s): Zainab Akhter 1,*, Judith Rankin 1, Dries Ceulemans 2, Lem Ngongalah 1, Roger Ackroyd 3, Roland Devlieger 2, Rute Vieira 4, Nicola Heslehurst 1 Introduction Obesity is a global [...]
- Subjects :
- Obesity -- Complications and side effects
Bariatric surgery -- Usage
Pregnancy -- Health aspects
Mortality
Hypertension
Genetic disorders
Infants
Infant mortality
Neonatal intensive care
Pregnant women
Newborn infants
Gestational diabetes
Fetal development
Gastric bypass
Future predictions
Comorbidity
Patient monitoring equipment
Biological sciences
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 15491277
- Volume :
- 16
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- Gale General OneFile
- Journal :
- PLoS Medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsgcl.600426421
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002866