Back to Search Start Over

Guidelines for Pathologic Diagnosis of Malignant Mesothelioma: 2017 Update of the Consensus Statement From the International Mesothelioma Interest Group

Authors :
Husain, Aliya Noor
Colby, Thomas V.
Ordonez, Nelson G.
Allen, Timothy Craig
Attanoos, Richard Luther
Beasley, Mary Beth
Butnor, Kelly Jo
Chirieac, Lucian R.
Churg, Andrew M.
Dacic, Sanja
Galateau-Salle, Francoise
Gibbs, Allen
Gown, Allen M.
Krausz, Thomas
Litzky, Leslie Anne
Marchevsky, Alberto
Nicholson, Andrew G.
Roggli, Victor Louis
Sharma, Anupama K.
Travis, William D.
Walts, Ann E.
Wick, Mark R.
Source :
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. January, 2018, Vol. 142 Issue 1, p89, 20 p.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Context.--Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an uncommon tumor that can be difficult to diagnose.Objective.--To provide updated, practical guidelines for the pathologic diagnosis of MM.Data Sources.--Pathologists involved in the International Mesothelioma Interest Group and others with an interest and expertise in the field contributed to this update. Reference material included up-to-date, peer-reviewed publications and textbooks.Conclusions.--There was discussion and consensus opinion regarding guidelines for (1) distinguishing benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations (both epithelioid and spindle cell lesions), (2) cytologic diagnosis of MM, (3) recognition of the key histologic features of pleural and peritoneal MM, (4) use of histochemical and immunohistochemical stains in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MM, (5) differentiating epithelioid MM from various carcinomas (lung, breast, ovarian, and colonic adenocarcinomas, and squamous cell and renal cell carcinomas), (6) diagnosis of sarcomatoid MM, (7) use of molecular markers in the diagnosis of MM, (8) electron microscopy in the diagnosis of mM, and (9) some caveats and pitfalls in the diagnosis of MM. Immunohistochemical panels are integral to the diagnosis of MM, but the exact makeup of panels employed is dependent on the differential diagnosis and on the antibodies available in a given laboratory. Depending on the morphology, immunohistochemical panels should contain both positive and negative markers for mesothelial differentiation and for lesions considered in the differential diagnosis. Immunohistochemical markers should have either sensitivity or specificity greater than 80% for the lesions in question. Interpretation of positivity generally should take into account the localization of the stain (eg, nuclear versus cytoplasmic) and the percentage of cells staining (>10% is suggested for cytoplasmic and membranous markers). Selected molecular markers are now being used to distinguish benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations. These guidelines are meant to be a practical diagnostic reference for the pathologist; however, some new pathologic predictors of prognosis and response to therapy are also included.(Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142:89-108; doi: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0124-RA)<br />The pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma (MM) continues to evolve and be refined as more antibodies and molecular tests become available for general use. This is especially applicable to distinguishing [...]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15432165
Volume :
142
Issue :
1
Database :
Gale General OneFile
Journal :
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsgcl.533000145
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2017-0124-RA