Back to Search Start Over

A brief version of the unhelpful thoughts and beliefs about stuttering scales: the UTBAS-6

Authors :
Iverach, Lisa
Heard, Rob
Menzies, Ross
Lowe, Robyn
O'Brian, Sue
Packman, Ann
Onslow, Mark
Source :
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. October 1, 2016, p964, 9 p.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Purpose: A significant proportion of adults who stutter experience anxiety in social and speaking situations. The Unhelpful Thoughts and Beliefs About Stuttering (UTBAS) scales provide a comprehensive measure of the unhelpful cognitions associated with social anxiety in stuttering. However, reducing the number of UTBAS items would make it ideal as a brief screening instrument. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop a brief version of the full UTBAS scales. Method: The 66-item UTBAS scales were completed by 337 adults who stutter. Item reduction was used to determine a smaller set of items that could adequately reproduce the total score for each full UTBAS scale. Results: Item reduction resulted in the inclusion of six items for the brief UTBAS-6 scales. Decile ranges for scores on the brief UTBAS-6 provide reliable estimates of the full UTBAS scores and valuable clinical information about whether a psychological assessment is warranted. Conclusions: The brief UTBAS-6 provides a reliable and efficient means of screening the unhelpful thoughts and beliefs associated with speech-related anxiety among adults who stutter. Referral for a psychological assessment is recommended in cases where the UTBAS total score falls in or above the fifth decile.<br />Stuttering is a speech disorder that impedes the capacity to communicate effectively. The disorder is associated with numerous negative consequences across the lifespan, many of which begin in early childhood [...]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10924388
Database :
Gale General OneFile
Journal :
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsgcl.470867872
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0167