In defense of Rayburn House: why the Supreme Court should recognize an evidentiary privilege of nondisclosure in its speech or debate clause jurisprudence.

MLA

Kieser, Christopher M. “In Defense of Rayburn House: Why the Supreme Court Should Recognize an Evidentiary Privilege of Nondisclosure in Its Speech or Debate Clause Jurisprudence.” Notre Dame Law Review, vol. 88, no. 2, Dec. 2012, p. 1007. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsggo&AN=edsgcl.321898941&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.

APA

Kieser, C. M. (2012). In defense of Rayburn House: why the Supreme Court should recognize an evidentiary privilege of nondisclosure in its speech or debate clause jurisprudence. Notre Dame Law Review, 88(2), 1007.

Chicago

Kieser, Christopher M. 2012. “In Defense of Rayburn House: Why the Supreme Court Should Recognize an Evidentiary Privilege of Nondisclosure in Its Speech or Debate Clause Jurisprudence.” Notre Dame Law Review 88 (2): 1007. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsggo&AN=edsgcl.321898941&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.