A comparison of an interactive computer-based method with a conventional reading approach for learning pelvic anatomy

To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.076 Byline: Marlene M. Corton (a), Don D. McIntire (a), Clifford Y. Wai (a), Frank W. Ling (b), George D. Wendel (a) Abstract: This study was undertaken to assess the impact of interactive, computer-based versus conventional, paper-based format in student, resident, and fellow learning and retention of anatomy knowledge. Author Affiliation: (a) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (b) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN Article History: Received 21 February 2006; Revised 23 May 2006; Accepted 27 June 2006 Article Note: (footnote) Support provided by a grant from The Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics and continued support from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Obstetrics and Gynecology Department in the development of this project. Reprints not available from the authors.