Back to Search Start Over

Differences in Risk Factor Patterns Between Cervical and Trochanteric Hip Fractures

Authors :
MichaA<<lsson, K.
Weiderpass, E.
Farahmand, B. Y.
Baron, J. A.
Persson, P.-G.
Ziden, L.
Zetterberg, C.
Ljunghall, S.
Source :
Osteoporosis International. Nov, 1999, Vol. 10 Issue 6, p487, 8 p.
Publication Year :
1999

Abstract

Byline: K. MichaA&lt; Keywords: Key words: Cervical -- Estrogen -- Height -- Hip fracture -- Trochanteric Abstract: The two types of hip fracture -- cervical and trochanteric femoral fractures -- are generally considered together in etiologic studies. However, women with a trochanteric fracture may be more osteoporotic than those with cervical hip fractures, and have higher post-fracture mortality. To explore differences in risk factor patterns between the two types of hip fracture we used data from a large population-based case--control study in Swedish women, 50--81 years of age. Data were collected by questionnaire, to which more than 80% of subjects responded. Of the cases included, 811 had had a cervical fracture and 483 a trochanteric fracture during the study period these cases were compared with 3312 randomly selected controls. Height and hormonal factors appeared to affect the risk of the two types of hip fracture differently. For every 5 cm of current height, women with a cervical fracture had an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.23 (95% CI 1.15--1.32) compared with an OR of 1.06 (95% CI 0.97--1.15) for women with trochanteric fractures. Later menopausal age was protective for trochanteric fractures (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91--0.99 per 2 years) but no such association was found for cervical fractures. Compared with never smokers, current smokers had an OR of 1.48 (95% CI 1.12--1.95) for trochanteric fractures and 1.22 (95% CI 0.98--1.52) for cervical fractures. Current hormone replacement therapy was similarly protective for both fracture types, but former use substantially reduced risk only for trochanteric fractures: OR 0.55 (95% CI 0.33--0.92) compared with 1.00 (95% CI 0.71--1.39) for cervical fractures. These risk factor patterns suggest etiologic differences between the fracture types which have to be considered when planning preventive interventions. Author Affiliation: (1) Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden, SE (2) Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, SE (3) Division of Epidemiology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, SE (4) Departments of Medicine and Community &amp;amp Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA, US (5) Vasa Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden, SE (6) Department of Orthopedics, Halmstad, Sweden , SE (7) Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden, SE Article note: Received: 22 March 1999 / Accepted: 28 May 1999

Subjects

Subjects :
Health

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0937941X
Volume :
10
Issue :
6
Database :
Gale General OneFile
Journal :
Osteoporosis International
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsgcl.163464765