Cite
The reach of the long-arm after Malone & Hyde, Inc. v. Chisley: still a 'vague and tangled' area of the law?
MLA
Hodges, David A. “The Reach of the Long-Arm after Malone & Hyde, Inc. v. Chisley: Still a ‘Vague and Tangled’ Area of the Law?” Arkansas Law Review, vol. 47, no. 1, Jan. 1994, pp. 209–38. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsggo&AN=edsgcl.14995802&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.
APA
Hodges, D. A. (1994, January 1). The reach of the long-arm after Malone & Hyde, Inc. v. Chisley: still a “vague and tangled” area of the law? Arkansas Law Review, 47(1), 209–238.
Chicago
Hodges, David A. 1994. “The Reach of the Long-Arm after Malone & Hyde, Inc. v. Chisley: Still a ‘Vague and Tangled’ Area of the Law?” Arkansas Law Review, January 1. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsggo&AN=edsgcl.14995802&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.