Grutter and Gratz: race preference to increase racial representation held 'patently unconstitutional' unless done subtly enough in the name of pursuing 'diversity'.

MLA

Graglia, Lino. “Grutter and Gratz: Race Preference to Increase Racial Representation Held ‘Patently Unconstitutional’ Unless Done Subtly Enough in the Name of Pursuing ‘Diversity.’” Tulane Law Review, vol. 78, no. 6, June 2004, pp. 2037–52. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsggo&AN=edsgcl.124730378&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.

APA

Graglia, L. (2004). Grutter and Gratz: race preference to increase racial representation held “patently unconstitutional” unless done subtly enough in the name of pursuing “diversity.” Tulane Law Review, 78(6), 2037–2052.

Chicago

Graglia, Lino. 2004. “Grutter and Gratz: Race Preference to Increase Racial Representation Held ‘Patently Unconstitutional’ Unless Done Subtly Enough in the Name of Pursuing ‘Diversity.’” Tulane Law Review 78 (6): 2037–52. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsggo&AN=edsgcl.124730378&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.