Back to Search Start Over

Prevalence study of intermittent hormonal therapy of Prostate Cancer patients in Spain [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Authors :
Xavier Bonfill-Cosp
Ariadna Auladell-Rispau
Ignasi Gich
Javier Zamora
Luis Carlos Saiz
Jose Ignacio Pijoan
Iratxe Urreta
José Antonio Cordero
Author Affiliations :
<relatesTo>1</relatesTo>Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain<br /><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain<br /><relatesTo>3</relatesTo>Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain<br /><relatesTo>4</relatesTo>Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain<br /><relatesTo>5</relatesTo>Institute of Metabolism and System Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK<br /><relatesTo>6</relatesTo>Unit of Innovation and Organization, Navarre Health Service, Pamplona, Spain<br /><relatesTo>7</relatesTo>Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Hospital Universitario Cruces/BioCruces-Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain<br /><relatesTo>8</relatesTo>Clinical Epidemiology and Research Unit, University Hospital of Donostia, Donostia, Spain<br /><relatesTo>9</relatesTo>School of Health Sciences Blanquerna, University Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain
Source :
F1000Research. 10:1069
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2022.

Abstract

Background: Although intermittent androgen deprivation therapy was introduced many years ago to improve patients’ quality of life with the same carcinologic efficiency as continuous hormonal therapy, recent data suggest that intermittency could be underutilised. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of prostate cancer patients receiving intermittent androgen deprivation therapy in Spain. Methods: A retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted using electronic drug dispensation data from four Spanish autonomous communities, which encompass 17.23 million inhabitants (36.22% of the total population in Spain). We estimated intermittent androgen therapy use (%IAD) and the prevalence of patients under intermittent androgen therapy in reference to the total number of PC patients using hormonal therapy (P IAD) and stratified by region. Other outcome variables included the pharmaceutical forms dispensed and the total direct annual expenditure on androgen deprivation therapy‐associated medications. Results: A total of 863,005 dispensations corresponding to a total of 65,752 men were identified, treated with either luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues (353,162) administered alone or in combination with anti‐androgens (509,843). Overall, the mean (±SD) age of the patients was 76.9 (±10.4) years. Results revealed that the mean annual P IAD along the study was 6.6% in the total population studied, and the overall %IAD during the five‐year study period was 5.6%. The mean cost of hormonal therapy per year was 25 million euros for LHRH analogues and 6.3 million euros for anti-androgens. Conclusions: Few prostate cancer patients in Spain use the intermittent androgen deprivation therapy suggesting underutilization of a perfectly valid option for a significant proportion of patients, missing the opportunity to improve their quality of life and to reduce costs for the National Health Service with comparable overall survival rates than continuous therapy.

Details

ISSN :
20461402
Volume :
10
Database :
F1000Research
Journal :
F1000Research
Notes :
Revised Amendments from Version 1 The main points suggested by reviewers were considered in the new version but the key conclusions of the article do not change. The statistical analysis comparing the four communities and the five years of follow up were added along the text and in Table 2. Due to the big size of the sample used, all comparisons resulted statistically significant. On the other side, the expression "overtreated patients" was removed and the main conclusion was focused on the underutilisation of IAD in Spain and the consequent risk of more adverse effects for these PCa patients., , [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.53875.2
Document Type :
research-article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53875.2