Back to Search Start Over

SARS-CoV-2 and the role of airborne transmission: a systematic review [version 2; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 2 not approved]

Authors :
Carl J. Heneghan
Elizabeth A. Spencer
Jon Brassey
Annette Plüddemann
Igho J. Onakpoya
David H. Evans
John M. Conly
Tom Jefferson
Author Affiliations :
<relatesTo>1</relatesTo>University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK<br /><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>Trip Database, Trip, Bristol, UK<br /><relatesTo>3</relatesTo>Li Ka Shing Institute of Virology and Dept of Medical Microbiology & Immunology, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada<br /><relatesTo>4</relatesTo>University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
Source :
F1000Research. 10:232
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2021.

Abstract

Background: Airborne transmission is the spread of an infectious agent caused by the dissemination of droplet nuclei (aerosols) that remain infectious when suspended in the air. We carried out a systematic review to identify, appraise and summarise the evidence from studies of the role of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Methods: We searched LitCovid, MedRxiv, Google Scholar and the WHO Covid-19 database from 1 February to 20 December 2020 and included studies on airborne transmission. Data were dual extracted and we assessed quality using a modified QUADAS 2 risk of bias tool. Results: We included 67 primary studies and 22 reviews on airborne SARS-CoV-2. Of the 67 primary studies, 53 (79%) reported data on RT-PCR from air samples, 12 (18%) report cycle threshold values and 18 (127%) copies per sample volume. All primary studies were observational and of low quality. The research often lacked standard methods, standard sampling sizes and reporting items. We found 36 descriptions of different air samplers deployed. Of the 42 studies conducted in-hospital that reported binary RT-PCR tests, 24 (57%) reported positive results for SARs-CoV-2 (142 positives out of 1,403 samples: average 10.1%, range 0% to 100%). There was no pattern between the type of hospital setting (ICU versus non-ICU) and RT-PCR positivity. Seventeen studies reported potential air transmission in the outdoors or in the community, of which seven performed RT-PCR sampling, and two studies reported weak positive RNA samples for 2 or more genes (5 of 125 samples positive: average 4.0%). Ten studies attempted viral culture with no serial passage. Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 RNA is detected intermittently in the air in various settings. Standardized guidelines for conducting and reporting research on airborne transmission are needed. The lack of recoverable viral culture samples of SARS-CoV-2 prevents firm conclusions from being drawn about airborne transmission.

Details

ISSN :
20461402
Volume :
10
Database :
F1000Research
Journal :
F1000Research
Notes :
Revised Amendments from Version 1 We have revised the introduction, added further details to the methods section and addressed all the review comments., , [version 2; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 2 not approved]
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.52091.2
Document Type :
systematic-review
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.52091.2