Back to Search Start Over

Cigarette consumption in adult dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes: a review of the evidence, including new results from the PATH study [version 2; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]

Authors :
Peter N. Lee
John S. Fry
Barbara A. Forey
Katharine J. Coombs
Alison J. Thornton
Author Affiliations :
<relatesTo>1</relatesTo>P.N.Lee Statistics and Computing Ltd, Sutton, Surreu, SM2 5DA, UK<br /><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>Epidemiology and Statistics, RoeLee Statistics Ltd, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5DA, UK<br /><relatesTo>3</relatesTo>Independent Consultant, Dartmouth, Devon, TQ6 9HB, UK<br /><relatesTo>4</relatesTo>Epidemiology and Statistics, P N Lee Statistics and Computing Ltd, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5 DA, UK<br /><relatesTo>5</relatesTo>Independent Consultant, Okehampton, Devon, EX20 1SG, UK
Source :
F1000Research. 9:630
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2021.

Abstract

Background: Modelling disease risk from e-cigarette use requires knowing how much e-cigarette uptake affects a smoker’s cigarette consumption. From Waves 1-3 of the US PATH study and other evidence, we sought answers to three questions: (Q1) Does consumption differ between dual users and exclusive smokers? (Q2) Does initiating e-cigarettes affect cigarette consumption? (Q3) Is baseline consumption related to later initiation of e-cigarettes? Methods: Consumption data from PATH were corrected for clear recording errors, with e-cigarette use classified as established or every day, and adjustment made for demographics, use of alcohol, drugs and other tobacco products, and age of starting smoking. Searches identified other studies published since 2008, with Q1 answered from cross-sectional studies, and Q2 and Q3 also from prospective studies. Results: (Q1) In PATH, consumption in current every day e-cigarette users was 2-3 cigarettes per day lower in dual users, with no difference seen in established users. From 31 published studies, consumption was no lower in dual users for current or ever e-cigarette users. (Q2) In PATH study consistent decreases in consumption occurred in those becoming every day dual users with increases seen in those reverting to exclusive smoking. Thirteen published studies consistently showed reduced consumption in those becoming dual users. (Q3) Three studies consistently showed greater consumption in smokers subsequently initiating e-cigarettes, but no significant difference was seen for PATH. Conclusions: Assessment is complicated by the few every day e-cigarette users in PATH, and between-study variability in quantifying e-cigarette use and presentation of results. As taking up e-cigarettes is associated with reducing consumption, finding no clear cross-sectional difference between dual users and exclusive smokers suggests smokers taking up e-cigarettes had higher consumption initially, limited evidence supporting this. Given the much lower disease risk of e-cigarettes vs. cigarettes, smokers becoming dual users should somewhat reduce their disease risk.

Details

ISSN :
20461402
Volume :
9
Database :
F1000Research
Journal :
F1000Research
Notes :
Revised Amendments from Version 1 The article has been revised following the reviewer comments of Drs Wei, Lizhnyak and Sarkar to which we have also replied in detail. The changes made include the following: 1. Amending the first paragraph of the methods section to make it clear that the analyses were based on those aged 18 to 64 years, and not 18 to 54 years, and giving reasons why we did not consider those aged 65+ years; 2. Clarifying the fourth paragraph of the methods section to make it clearer how adjustment for other predictors was carried out; 3. Adding clarification to Tables 1, 2 and 3 by extra footnotes and making it clear where use was of e-cigarettes; 4. Correcting a conclusion when commenting on the study by Andler et al., 2016 so that the results suggested that "vapers were more likely to be heavier smokers" rather than that "heavier smokers were more likely to start vaping"; and 5. Correcting the second reason for rejection in the searches to "Study only of adolescents..." (Word "only" added.), , [version 2; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.24589.2
Document Type :
research-article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24589.2