Back to Search Start Over

Video-augmented vs standard consent in an early ICU cycling feasibility trial: a randomized embedded recruitment trial [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Authors :
Michelle E. Kho
Mark Duffett
France J. Clarke
Melissa Shears
Alexander J. Molloy
Deborah J. Cook
Author Affiliations :
<relatesTo>1</relatesTo>School of Rehabiltation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada<br /><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>Department of Physiotherapy, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada<br /><relatesTo>3</relatesTo>Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada<br /><relatesTo>4</relatesTo>Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada<br /><relatesTo>5</relatesTo>Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada<br /><relatesTo>6</relatesTo>Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Source :
F1000Research. 9:45
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2020.

Abstract

Background: In a trial of early in-bed cycling in critically ill patients, a video demonstrating use of the cycle in addition to verbal description may improve satisfaction with the informed consent process for all persons involved. Methods: A convenience sample of in-person consent encounters for enrolment in TryCYCLE (NCT01885442), a 33-patient pilot study of in-bed cycling with mechanically ventilated patients in an intensive care unit, were recruited. In this study within a trial, using concealed allocation, we randomized consent encounters to a Video or Standard consent approach. Those in the Video group viewed a 2-minute video of a model using in-bed cycling plus the routine verbal description of the study. The Standard group received the routine verbal description only. Patients and/or substitute decision makers (SDMs) were blinded to the study purpose. After each encounter, patients and/or SDMs and the research coordinator submitted written satisfaction and comfort ratings using 7-point scales (higher scores better). We documented consent outcomes and analyzed between group differences with independent group t-tests. Results: We randomized 14 encounters (6 Video, 8 Standard). Ten completed questionnaires (5 in each group) demonstrated no difference in patient and/or SDM satisfaction or comfort between Video or Standard (mean [standard deviation] Satisfaction: 6.8[0.45] vs. 7.0[0] vs. p=0.37; Comfort: 7.0[0] vs. 7.0[0], p>0.99). The research coordinator evaluated all randomized encounters, with no differences between Video or Standard (Satisfaction: 7.0[0] vs. 6.9[0.35], p=0.41; Comfort: 6.7[0.52] vs. 6.9[0.35], p=0.39). All 14 consent encounters enrolled in TryCYCLE. Conclusions: Patient and/or SDM satisfaction and comfort with consent was very high for both the Video and Standard approaches. Further research, including use of videos to portray different study interventions, is needed, including analysis of patient and/or SDM satisfaction, comfort, comprehension, and consent rates. Registration for host trial: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01885442, registered on June 25, 2013

Details

ISSN :
20461402
Volume :
9
Database :
F1000Research
Journal :
F1000Research
Notes :
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.21750.1
Document Type :
research-article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.21750.1