Back to Search Start Over

One-year test-retest reliability of ten vision tests in Canadian athletes [version 1; peer review: 1 approved]

Authors :
Mehdi Aloosh
Suzanne Leclerc
Stephanie Long
Guowei Zhong
James M. Brophy
Tibor Schuster
Russell Steele
Ian Shrier
Author Affiliations :
<relatesTo>1</relatesTo>Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada<br /><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada<br /><relatesTo>3</relatesTo>Institut National du Sport du Quebec, Montreal, Canada<br /><relatesTo>4</relatesTo>Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada<br /><relatesTo>5</relatesTo>Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada<br /><relatesTo>6</relatesTo>Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada<br /><relatesTo>7</relatesTo>Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Source :
F1000Research. 8:1032
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2019.

Abstract

Background: Vision tests are increasingly being suggested for use in concussion management and baseline testing. Concussions, however, often occur months after baseline testing and reliability studies generally examine intervals limited to days or one week. Therefore, our objective was to determine the one-year test-retest reliability of these tests. Methods: We assessed one-year test-retest reliability of ten vision tests in elite Canadian athletes followed by the Institut National du Sport du Quebec. We included athletes who completed two baseline (preseason) annual evaluations by one clinician within 365±30 days. We excluded athletes with any concussion or vision training in between the annual evaluations or presented with any factor that is believed to affect the tests (e.g. migraines, etc.). Data were collected from clinical charts. We evaluated test-retest reliability using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA). Results: We examined nine female and seven male athletes with a mean age of 22.7 (SD 4.5) years. Among the vision tests, we observed excellent test-retest reliability in Positive Fusional Vergence at 30cm (ICC=0.93) but this dropped to 0.55 when an outlier was excluded. There was moderate reliability in Negative Fusional Vergence at 30cm (ICC=0.78), Phoria at 30cm (ICC=0.68), Near Point of Convergence break (ICC=0.65) and Saccade (ICC=0.56). The ICC for Positive Fusional Vergence at 3m (ICC=0.56) also decreased to 0.45 after removing one outlier. We found poor reliability in Near Point of Convergence (ICC=0.47), Gross Stereoscopic Acuity (ICC=0.03) and Negative Fusional Vergence at 3m (ICC=0.0). ICC for Phoria at 3m was not appropriate because scores were identical in 14/16 athletes. 95% LoA of the majority of tests were ±40% to ±90%. Conclusions: Four tests had moderate one-year test-retest reliability. The remaining tests had poor reliability. The tests would therefore be useful only if concussion has a moderate-large effect on scores.

Details

ISSN :
20461402
Volume :
8
Database :
F1000Research
Journal :
F1000Research
Notes :
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved]
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.19587.1
Document Type :
research-article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19587.1