Back to Search Start Over

Human TP53 gene polymorphisms among patients with Hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic hepatitis B infection in Kenya [version 2; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]

Authors :
Missiani Ochwoto
Colins O. Oduma
Julius Oyugi
Dufton Mwaengo
Bartholomew N. Ondigo
James H. Kimotho
Alex K. Maiyo
Ruth M. Nyangacha
Gladys Chesumbai
Elijah Songok
Author Affiliations :
<relatesTo>1</relatesTo>Kenya Medical Research Institute,, Nairobi, Kenya<br /><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>Microbiology Department, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya<br /><relatesTo>3</relatesTo>Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Egerton University, Nakuru, Kenya<br /><relatesTo>4</relatesTo>Eldoret Cancer Registry, Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Eldoret, Kenya
Source :
F1000Research. 8:1364
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2024.

Abstract

Background Human TP53 is the gatekeeper for generation of human cells and is highly conserved. Some alteration/mutation in TP53 adversely affects the regulatory function of the protein, potentially resulting in cancer. This study investigated mutations in codons 72 and 249 of TP53, among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection at the Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), Eldoret, Kenya. Methods In total, 33 HBV-positive patients attending MTRH hospital between September 2013 and July 2017 were purposely selected from medical records for the study; those with HCC were confirmed from the cancer registry. The patients were aged between 25-67 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.1:1. Blood samples were collected from the patients. DNA was extracted, amplified and sequenced using TP53 forward and reverse primers. Gene mutation detection and analysis was done on exons 4 codon 72 and exon 7 codon 249. Results Of the 33 patients, 75.8% were chronically infected with HBV and had HCC; the rest were HBsAg positive without HCC. Homozygous proline was prevalent (54.5%) at exon 4 codon 72, followed by heterozygous Arg/Pro (33.3%) and lastly homozygous Arg/Arg (12.1%). Pro/Pro allele was frequent in HCC group while Arg/Arg allele was common in patients without HCC. There was no significant association between the HCC and codon polymorphisms (P=0.12). In exon 7, codon 249, 24.2% of patients had an Arg/Ser mutation of which, 75.0% had HCC and 25.0% did not. There was no significant association between HCC patients and codon 249 mutation (P=0.15). Conclusion TP53 is a gene gate keeper, the mutations under study may dependently play a role in HCC development. This study did not find any association between TP53 mutations and presence of HCC. Therefore, TP53 Arg-72 and Ser-249 mutation is not a clear prognosis indicator for hepatocellular carcinoma among HBV infected patients in Kenya.

Details

ISSN :
20461402
Volume :
8
Database :
F1000Research
Journal :
F1000Research
Notes :
Revised Amendments from Version 1 The main reason for this version is to submit our responses addressing comments raised by the reviewers (Lamech Mwapagha and Harris Onywera) so that we complete the publication process. In this version, we have deleted information on exon 6 so that this publication will concentrate on polymorphisms of exon 4 and 7. Abstract: We have edited the conclusion to align with the findings “TP53 Arg-72 and Ser-249 mutation is not a clear prognosis indicator for hepatocellular carcinoma.” In methods: We have provided the justification of conducting the study at MTRH. All reagents and machines used have the name, the manufacturer and town/city. In PCR amplification, we have provided expected band size in the electrophoresis. In Results: We have provided GenBank accession numbers (MN119310-MN119350) of the sequences generated for confirmation. We have provided Figure 2, which is a summary of aligned TP53 exon 4, codon 72 amino acids sequence. This figure will provide a quick visualization of the mutations. We have provided additional information in caption of Figure 1 to explain the details in the figure. Meaning of abbreviation used in Table 3 and Table 4 are now explained below each table. In discussion we added a statement as one of the limitations of the study as suggested by the reviewers. In reference, we have added reference 9 (Hall et al., 2011) and 30 (Kumar et al., 2016)., , [version 2; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.19416.2
Document Type :
research-article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19416.2