Back to Search
Start Over
Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
- Source :
- F1000Research. 12:1579
- Publication Year :
- 2024
- Publisher :
- London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2024.
-
Abstract
- Background This study applied geographical standards (coverage distance) and demographic standards to investigate the capabilities of primary healthcare facilities to cover the largest area of the study area and the service area that can be accessed. This study was conducted to find out the sufficient number of primary healthcare (PHC) centers required to provide healthcare services to the entire community. Methods Data was obtained by applying geographic information system (GIS) techniques to analyze primary care facilities using the demographic and geographic standards for primary care facilities. Results PHC centers cover 79% of the study area according to the geographical standard. The study area needs 41 additional centers to cover the shortfall in service provision per the demographic and geographic standards. Conclusions A significant deficiency in the number of primary care centers found in the study area compared to the large population at the geographical and demographic standards level.
Details
- ISSN :
- 20461402
- Volume :
- 12
- Database :
- F1000Research
- Journal :
- F1000Research
- Notes :
- Revised Amendments from Version 2 Title: The title remains unchanged. Abstract: No modifications were made to the abstract. Figures No modifications were made to the Figures. Tables No modifications were made to the Tables Introduction: Additional citations were included to further substantiate the background and context of our study based on the reviewer. Methods: Expanding this section to increase replicability, providing more comprehensive descriptions of the GIS techniques based on the reviewer. Results: Clarifications were added based on the reviewer. Discussion and Recommendations: The discussion was enhanced to explore the implications of findings in greater depth, particularly regarding underserved areas. New recommendations added based on the reviewer., , [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.140107.3
- Document Type :
- research-article
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.140107.3