Back to Search Start Over

Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery [version 1; referees: 2 approved]

Authors :
Unyime Ituk
Ashraf S. Habib
Author Affiliations :
<relatesTo>1</relatesTo>Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA<br /><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA
Source :
F1000Research. 7:F1000 Faculty Rev-513
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2018.

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery is a concept initially developed for patients undergoing colorectal surgery but has been adopted by other surgical specialties with similar positive outcomes. The adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery in the obstetric patient population is rapidly gaining popularity. This review highlights perioperative interventions that should be considered in an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for women undergoing cesarean delivery.

Details

ISSN :
20461402
Volume :
7
Database :
F1000Research
Journal :
F1000Research
Notes :
Editorial Note on the Review Process F1000 Faculty Reviews are commissioned from members of the prestigious F1000 Faculty and are edited as a service to readers. In order to make these reviews as comprehensive and accessible as possible, the referees provide input before publication and only the final, revised version is published. The referees who approved the final version are listed with their names and affiliations but without their reports on earlier versions (any comments will already have been addressed in the published version). The referees who approved this article are: Dan Benhamou, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Groupe Hospitalier et Faculté de Médecine Paris Sud, Paris, France No competing interests were disclosed. Mohamed Tiouririne, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA No competing interests were disclosed., , [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.13895.1
Document Type :
review
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13895.1