Back to Search
Start Over
Epidemiological evidence relating environmental smoke to COPD in lifelong non-smokers: a systematic review [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
- Source :
- F1000Research. 7:146
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Background: Some evidence suggests environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) might cause chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We reviewed available epidemiological data in never smokers. Methods: We identified epidemiological studies providing estimates of relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for various ETS exposure indices. Confounder-adjusted RRs for COPD were extracted, or derived using standard methods. Meta-analyses were conducted for each exposure index, with tests for heterogeneity and publication bias. For the main index (spouse ever smoked or nearest equivalent), analyses investigated variation in RR by location, publication period, study type, sex, diagnosis, study size, confounder adjustment, never smoker definition, and exposure index definition. Results: Twenty-eight relevant studies were identified; nine European or Middle Eastern, nine Asian, eight American and two from multiple countries. Five were prospective, seven case-control and 16 cross-sectional. The COPD definition involved death or hospitalisation in seven studies, GOLD stage 1+ criteria in twelve, and other definitions in nine. For the main index, random-effects meta-analysis of 33 heterogeneous (p Conclusions: Although the evidence strongly suggests that ETS increases COPD, study weaknesses and absence of well-designed large studies preclude reliable effect estimation. More definitive evidence is required.
Details
- ISSN :
- 20461402
- Volume :
- 7
- Database :
- F1000Research
- Journal :
- F1000Research
- Notes :
- Revised Amendments from Version 2 The text has been amended to make clearer that the evidence strongly suggests - but does not definitively prove - that ETS increases COPD risk. Amendments have been made: (i) in the conclusions section of the abstract where we now say "strongly suggests" rather than "suggests", (ii) in the section "Comparison with other recently published reviews" in the Discussion, where the final paragraph now starts "Generally these reviews point to an association between ETS exposure and risk of COPD without concluding that a causal relationship has clearly been established. The present review confirms the association and provides evidence that is strongly suggestive of a true effect". It then ends with a sentence "While this suggestion is not inconsistent with the view of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (Reference added) that second-hand smoke is a risk factor for COPD, limitations of the evidence, discussed above, preclude a more definitive conclusion" which refers to a recent study mentioned by one of the reviewers. (iii) at the start of the Conclusions section after the Discussion which now begins "Taken in conjunction with the strong association of smoking with COPD, the significant relationship seen for the main index of ETS exposure, and the evidence of a dose-response relationship is high;y suggestive that ETS also increases risk of COPD. However, the absence of....." The two referees are now thanked in the Acknowledgement Section., , [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.13887.3
- Document Type :
- systematic-review
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13887.3