Back to Search Start Over

Development and validation of risk prediction models for COVID-19 positivity in a hospital setting

Authors :
Ming-Yen Ng
Eric Yuk Fai Wan
Ho Yuen Frank Wong
Siu Ting Leung
Jonan Chun Yin Lee
Thomas Wing-Yan Chin
Christine Shing Yen Lo
Macy Mei-Sze Lui
Edward Hung Tat Chan
Ambrose Ho-Tung Fong
Sau Yung Fung
On Hang Ching
Keith Wan-Hang Chiu
Tom Wai Hin Chung
Varut Vardhanbhuti
Hiu Yin Sonia Lam
Kelvin Kai Wang To
Jeffrey Long Fung Chiu
Tina Poy Wing Lam
Pek Lan Khong
Raymond Wai To Liu
Johnny Wai Man Chan
Alan Ka Lun Wu
Kwok-Cheung Lung
Ivan Fan Ngai Hung
Chak Sing Lau
Michael D. Kuo
Mary Sau-Man Ip
Source :
International Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol 101, Iss , Pp 74-82 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2020.

Abstract

Objectives: To develop: (1) two validated risk prediction models for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) positivity using readily available parameters in a general hospital setting; (2) nomograms and probabilities to allow clinical utilisation. Methods: Patients with and without COVID-19 were included from 4 Hong Kong hospitals. The database was randomly split into 2:1: for model development database (n = 895) and validation database (n = 435). Multivariable logistic regression was utilised for model creation and validated with the Hosmer–Lemeshow (H–L) test and calibration plot. Nomograms and probabilities set at 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 were calculated to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: A total of 1330 patients (mean age 58.2 ± 24.5 years; 50.7% males; 296 COVID-19 positive) were recruited. The first prediction model developed had age, total white blood cell count, chest x-ray appearances and contact history as significant predictors (AUC = 0.911 [CI = 0.880−0.941]). The second model developed has the same variables except contact history (AUC = 0.880 [CI = 0.844−0.916]). Both were externally validated on the H–L test (p = 0.781 and 0.155, respectively) and calibration plot. Models were converted to nomograms. Lower probabilities give higher sensitivity and NPV; higher probabilities give higher specificity and PPV. Conclusion: Two simple-to-use validated nomograms were developed with excellent AUCs based on readily available parameters and can be considered for clinical utilisation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
12019712
Volume :
101
Issue :
74-82
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.ff10abb8bb747cb9b2ff1fdd2740dfa
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.022