Back to Search Start Over

Using healthcare systems data for outcomes in clinical trials: issues to consider at the design stage

Authors :
Alice-Maria Toader
Marion K. Campbell
Jennifer K. Quint
Michael Robling
Matthew R Sydes
Joanna Thorn
Alexandra Wright-Hughes
Ly-Mee Yu
Tom. E. F. Abbott
Simon Bond
Fergus J. Caskey
Madeleine Clout
Michelle Collinson
Bethan Copsey
Gwyneth Davies
Timothy Driscoll
Carrol Gamble
Xavier L. Griffin
Thomas Hamborg
Jessica Harris
David A. Harrison
Deena Harji
Emily J. Henderson
Pip Logan
Sharon B. Love
Laura A. Magee
Alastair O’Brien
Maria Pufulete
Padmanabhan Ramnarayan
Athanasios Saratzis
Jo Smith
Ivonne Solis-Trapala
Clive Stubbs
Amanda Farrin
Paula Williamson
Source :
Trials, Vol 25, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
BMC, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract Background Healthcare system data (HSD) are increasingly used in clinical trials, augmenting or replacing traditional methods of collecting outcome data. This study, PRIMORANT, set out to identify, in the UK context, issues to be considered before the decision to use HSD for outcome data in a clinical trial is finalised, a methodological question prioritised by the clinical trials community. Methods The PRIMORANT study had three phases. First, an initial workshop was held to scope the issues faced by trialists when considering whether to use HSDs for trial outcomes. Second, a consultation exercise was undertaken with clinical trials unit (CTU) staff, trialists, methodologists, clinicians, funding panels and data providers. Third, a final discussion workshop was held, at which the results of the consultation were fed back, case studies presented, and issues considered in small breakout groups. Results Key topics included in the consultation process were the validity of outcome data, timeliness of data capture, internal pilots, data-sharing, practical issues, and decision-making. A majority of consultation respondents (n = 78, 95%) considered the development of guidance for trialists to be feasible. Guidance was developed following the discussion workshop, for the five broad areas of terminology, feasibility, internal pilots, onward data sharing, and data archiving. Conclusions We provide guidance to inform decisions about whether or not to use HSDs for outcomes, and if so, to assist trialists in working with registries and other HSD providers to improve the design and delivery of trials.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17456215
Volume :
25
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Trials
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.fe4d0815e14403eba11b00df3eba7e8
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-07926-z