Back to Search
Start Over
A bibliometric analysis of worldwide cancer research using machine learning methods
- Source :
- Cancer Innovation, Vol 2, Iss 3, Pp 219-232 (2023)
- Publication Year :
- 2023
- Publisher :
- Wiley, 2023.
-
Abstract
- Abstract With the progress and development of computer technology, applying machine learning methods to cancer research has become an important research field. To analyze the most recent research status and trends, main research topics, topic evolutions, research collaborations, and potential directions of this research field, this study conducts a bibliometric analysis on 6206 research articles worldwide collected from PubMed between 2011 and 2021 concerning cancer research using machine learning methods. Python is used as a tool for bibliometric analysis, Gephi is used for social network analysis, and the Latent Dirichlet Allocation model is used for topic modeling. The trend analysis of articles not only reflects the innovative research at the intersection of machine learning and cancer but also demonstrates its vigorous development and increasing impacts. In terms of journals, Nature Communications is the most influential journal and Scientific Reports is the most prolific one. The United States and Harvard University have contributed the most to cancer research using machine learning methods. As for the research topic, “Support Vector Machine,” “classification,” and “deep learning” have been the core focuses of the research field. Findings are helpful for scholars and related practitioners to better understand the development status and trends of cancer research using machine learning methods, as well as to have a deeper understanding of research hotspots.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 27709183
- Volume :
- 2
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- Journal :
- Cancer Innovation
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsdoj.fd93b35bf344995816525e31a901580
- Document Type :
- article
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cai2.68