Back to Search Start Over

Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020

Authors :
Elisabeth Bakker
Viktoriia Starokozhko
Jet W. M. Kraaijvanger
Hiddo J. L. Heerspink
Peter G. M. Mol
Source :
Clinical and Translational Science, Vol 16, Iss 11, Pp 2394-2412 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Wiley, 2023.

Abstract

Abstract Biomarkers can guide precision medicine in clinical trials and practice. They can increase clinical trials' efficiency through selection of study populations more likely to benefit from treatment, thus increasing statistical power and reducing sample size requirements or study duration. We performed a narrative synthesis to explore biomarker utilization for patient selection to guide precision medicine trials in marketing authorization dossiers of centrally approved medicines in Europe between 2018 and 2020 and analyzed in‐depth those that eventually included biomarkers in the medicines' indications. From 119 eligible products, 26 included a biomarker in the indication, of which most were oncology products (n = 15). Included biomarkers were often known from literature or from previously approved products in the European Union or the United States. Additionally, 52 dossiers mentioned one or more biomarkers for patient selection in their clinical efficacy and safety information. Although these were not always included in the medicines' indication, they were often implicitly embedded in condition definitions adopted from clinical guidelines or practice. In 15 out of the 26 medicines with a biomarker‐guided indication, only biomarker‐positive populations were included in the main clinical studies supporting the marketing authorization. These studies were mostly randomized controlled trials or single‐arm trials; only two products were studied for multiple indications in an innovative basket trial. Definitions of biomarkers could be subject of debate and needed adaptation after post hoc analyses requested by the assessment committee in four cases, stressing the importance of thorough justification of these definitions to include the right population for an optimal benefit–risk balance, enabling precise medicine.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17528062 and 17528054
Volume :
16
Issue :
11
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Clinical and Translational Science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.fcb37fd21f149beaaf01c50d0ffa6c4
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.13641